Literature DB >> 11712982

Anisotropy in judging the absolute direction of motion.

G Loffler1, H S Orbach.   

Abstract

The angular dependence of precision measurements is well established as the oblique effect in motion perception. Recently, it has been shown that the visual system also exhibits anisotropic behaviour with respect to accuracy of the absolute direction of motion of random dot fields. This study aimed to investigate whether this angular dependent, directional bias is a general phenomenon of motion perception. Our results demonstrate, for single translating tilted lines viewed foveally, an extraordinary illusion with perceptual deviations of up to 35 degrees from veridical. Not only is the magnitude of these deviations substantially larger than that for random dots, but the general pattern of the illusion is also different from that found for dot fields. Significant differences in the bias, as a function of line tilt and line length, suggest that the illusion does not result from fixed inaccuracies of the visual system in the computation of direction of motion. Potential sources for these large biases are motion integration mechanisms. These were also found to be anisotropic. The anisotropic nature and the surprisingly large magnitude of the effect make it a necessary consideration in analyses of motion experiments and in modelling studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11712982     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00209-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Hitting moving targets: a dissociation between the use of the target's speed and direction of motion.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Tom Middelburg; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Unequal representation of cardinal vs. oblique orientations in the middle temporal visual area.

Authors:  Xiangmin Xu; Christine E Collins; Ilya Khaytin; Jon H Kaas; Vivien A Casagrande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Diverted by dazzle: perceived movement direction is biased by target pattern orientation.

Authors:  Anna E Hughes; Christian Jones; Kaustuv Joshi; David J Tolhurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Quantifying "the aperture problem" for judgments of motion direction in natural scenes.

Authors:  David Kane; Peter Bex; Steven Dakin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  On interference effects in concurrent perception and action.

Authors:  Jan Zwickel; Marc Grosjean; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-02-13

6.  The what and why of perceptual asymmetries in the visual domain.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Haruyuki Kojima
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-12-15

7.  Testing neuronal accounts of anisotropic motion perception with computational modelling.

Authors:  William Wong; Nicholas Seow Chiang Price
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Apparent shift in long-range motion trajectory by local pattern orientation.

Authors:  Ryohei Nakayama; Daisuke Harada; Miyuki G Kamachi; Isamu Motoyoshi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.