Literature DB >> 10343802

Axis-of-motion affects direction discrimination, not speed discrimination.

N Matthews1, N Qian.   

Abstract

The motion of an object can be described by a single velocity vector, or equivalently, by direction and speed separately. Similarly, our ability to see subtle differences in the motion of two objects could be constrained by either a velocity-based sensory response, or separate sensory responses to direction and speed. To distinguish between these possibilities we investigated whether direction discrimination and speed discrimination were differentially affected by changes in the axis-of-motion. Psychophysical data from 12 naive observers indicated that direction discrimination depended on axis-of-motion, but speed discrimination did not. The difference suggests that a velocity-based sensory response is not the limiting factor on the two tasks. Instead, the results imply that the sensory response which constrains speed discrimination is at least partially independent from the sensory response which constrains direction discrimination.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10343802     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00300-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Hitting moving targets: a dissociation between the use of the target's speed and direction of motion.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Tom Middelburg; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Unequal representation of cardinal vs. oblique orientations in the middle temporal visual area.

Authors:  Xiangmin Xu; Christine E Collins; Ilya Khaytin; Jon H Kaas; Vivien A Casagrande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Can speed be judged independent of direction?

Authors:  Catherine Manning; Rory Trevelyan Thomas; Oliver Braddick
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Transfer of perceptual learning between different visual tasks.

Authors:  David P McGovern; Ben S Webb; Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Peeling plaids apart: context counteracts cross-orientation contrast masking.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Visual motion aftereffects arise from a cascade of two isomorphic adaptation mechanisms.

Authors:  Alan A Stocker; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Adaptation to one perceived motion direction can generate multiple velocity aftereffects.

Authors:  Nikos Gekas; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The what and why of perceptual asymmetries in the visual domain.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Haruyuki Kojima
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-12-15

9.  But Still It Moves: Static Image Statistics Underlie How We See Motion.

Authors:  Reuben Rideaux; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Tracking and perceiving diverse motion signals: Directional biases in human smooth pursuit and perception.

Authors:  Xiuyun Wu; Miriam Spering
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.