Literature DB >> 19139857

Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception.

Myrka Zago1, Joseph McIntyre, Patrice Senot, Francesco Lacquaniti.   

Abstract

Intercepting and avoiding collisions with moving objects are fundamental skills in daily life. Anticipatory behavior is required because of significant delays in transforming sensory information about target and body motion into a timed motor response. The ability to predict the kinematics and kinetics of interception or avoidance hundreds of milliseconds before the event may depend on several different sources of information and on different strategies of sensory-motor coordination. What are exactly the sources of spatio-temporal information and what are the control strategies remain controversial issues. Indeed, these topics have been the battlefield of contrasting views on how the brain interprets visual information to guide movement. Here we attempt a synthetic overview of the vast literature on interception. We discuss in detail the behavioral and neurophysiological aspects of interception of targets falling under gravity, as this topic has received special attention in recent years. We show that visual cues alone are insufficient to predict the time and place of interception or avoidance, and they need to be supplemented by prior knowledge (or internal models) about several features of the dynamic interaction with the moving object.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19139857     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1691-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  202 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Adapting to expansion increases perceived time-to-collision.

Authors:  R Gray; D Regan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target.

Authors:  B L Day; I N Lyon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates.

Authors:  A D Van Beuzekom; J A Van Gisbergen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Gianfranco Bosco; Vincenzo Maffei; Marco Iosa; Yuri P Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Visual processing of optic acceleration.

Authors:  P Werkhoven; H P Snippe; A Toet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  When is behavioral data evidence for a control theory? Tau-coupling revisited.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.422

Review 8.  Cognitive, perceptual and action-oriented representations of falling objects.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks.

Authors:  Giorgio Vallortigara; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Manual interception of moving targets. I. Performance and movement initiation.

Authors:  N L Port; D Lee; P Dassonville; A P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  78 in total

1.  The effects of familiar size and object trajectories on time-to-contact judgements.

Authors:  Simon G Hosking; Boris Crassini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effect of load uncertainty on anticipatory muscle activity in catching.

Authors:  Jason J Eckerle; William P Berg; Rose Marie Ward
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Memory and prediction in natural gaze control.

Authors:  Gabriel Diaz; Joseph Cooper; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Models for the extrapolation of target motion for manual interception.

Authors:  John F Soechting; John Z Juveli; Hrishikesh M Rao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Control of interceptive actions is based on expectancy of time to target arrival.

Authors:  Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Ageing of the postural vertical.

Authors:  Guillaume Barbieri; Anne-Sophie Gissot; Dominic Pérennou
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2009-08-27

7.  Controlling speed and direction during interception: an affordance-based approach.

Authors:  Julien Bastin; Brett R Fajen; Gilles Montagne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Advance knowledge effects on kinematics of one-handed catching.

Authors:  Pieter Tijtgat; Simon J Bennett; Geert J P Savelsbergh; Dirk De Clercq; Matthieu Lenoir
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Body orientation contributes to modelling the effects of gravity for target interception in humans.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Environmental constraints modify the way an interceptive action is controlled.

Authors:  Antoine H P Morice; Matthieu François; David M Jacobs; Gilles Montagne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.