Literature DB >> 28515287

Context effects on smooth pursuit and manual interception of a disappearing target.

Philipp Kreyenmeier1,2, Jolande Fooken1,3, Miriam Spering4,3,5,6,7.   

Abstract

In our natural environment, we interact with moving objects that are surrounded by richly textured, dynamic visual contexts. Yet most laboratory studies on vision and movement show visual objects in front of uniform gray backgrounds. Context effects on eye movements have been widely studied, but it is less well known how visual contexts affect hand movements. Here we ask whether eye and hand movements integrate motion signals from target and context similarly or differently, and whether context effects on eye and hand change over time. We developed a track-intercept task requiring participants to track the initial launch of a moving object ("ball") with smooth pursuit eye movements. The ball disappeared after a brief presentation, and participants had to intercept it in a designated "hit zone." In two experiments (n = 18 human observers each), the ball was shown in front of a uniform or a textured background that either was stationary or moved along with the target. Eye and hand movement latencies and speeds were similarly affected by the visual context, but eye and hand interception (eye position at time of interception, and hand interception timing error) did not differ significantly between context conditions. Eye and hand interception timing errors were strongly correlated on a trial-by-trial basis across all context conditions, highlighting the close relation between these responses in manual interception tasks. Our results indicate that visual contexts similarly affect eye and hand movements but that these effects may be short-lasting, affecting movement trajectories more than movement end points.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In a novel track-intercept paradigm, human observers tracked a briefly shown object moving across a textured, dynamic context and intercepted it with their finger after it had disappeared. Context motion significantly affected eye and hand movement latency and speed, but not interception accuracy; eye and hand position at interception were correlated on a trial-by-trial basis. Visual context effects may be short-lasting, affecting movement trajectories more than movement end points.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  manual interception; perception-action; prediction; smooth pursuit; visual context

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28515287      PMCID: PMC5501917          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00217.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  73 in total

1.  The role of execution noise in movement variability.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers; Patrick Haggard; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The effect of a moving background on aimed hand movements.

Authors:  H Mohrmann-Lendla; A G Fleischer
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 3.  Do we track what we see? Common versus independent processing for motion perception and smooth pursuit eye movements: a review.

Authors:  Miriam Spering; Anna Montagnini
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Judging object motion during smooth pursuit eye movements: the role of optic flow.

Authors:  E Brenner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Gaze-shift dynamics in two kinds of sequential looking tasks.

Authors:  J Epelboim; R M Steinman; E Kowler; Z Pizlo; C J Erkelens; H Collewijn
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The influence of stationary and moving textured backgrounds on smooth-pursuit initiation and steady state pursuit in humans.

Authors:  T Niemann; K P Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Slow eye movements induced by apparent target motion in monkey.

Authors:  W Waespe; U Schwarz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Judging object velocity during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  E Brenner; A V van den Berg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Human smooth and saccadic eye movements during voluntary pursuit of different target motions on different backgrounds.

Authors:  H Collewijn; E P Tamminga
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  PsychoPy--Psychophysics software in Python.

Authors:  Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  4 in total

1.  Earth-Gravity Congruent Motion Facilitates Ocular Control for Pursuit of Parabolic Trajectories.

Authors:  Björn Jörges; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The role of perception and action on the use of allocentric information in a large-scale virtual environment.

Authors:  Harun Karimpur; Johannes Kurz; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Motion-in-depth effects on interceptive timing errors in an immersive environment.

Authors:  Joan López-Moliner; Cristina de la Malla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Effects of visual blur and contrast on spatial and temporal precision in manual interception.

Authors:  Anna Schroeger; J Walter Tolentino-Castro; Markus Raab; Rouwen Cañal-Bruland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.