Literature DB >> 16082537

Effects of an orientation illusion on motor performance and motor imagery.

Scott Glover1, Peter Dixon, Umberto Castiello, Matthew F S Rushworth.   

Abstract

Although the effect of visual illusions on overt actions has been an area of keen interest in motor performance, no study has yet examined whether illusions have similar or different effects on overt and imagined movements. Two experiments were conducted that compared the effects of an orientation illusion on an overt posture selection task and an imagined posture selection task. In Experiment 1 subjects were given a choice of grasping a bar with the thumb on the left side or right side of the bar. In Experiment 2 subjects were instructed to only imagine grasping the bar while remaining motionless. Subjects then reported which side of the bar their thumb had been placed in imagined grasping. Both the overt selection and imagined selection tasks were found to be sensitive to the orientation illusion, suggesting that similar visual information is used for overt and imagined movements, with both being sensitive to an orientation illusion. The results are discussed in terms of the visual processing and representation of real and imagined actions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16082537     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2328-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Orientation of the opposition axis in mentally simulated grasping.

Authors:  V Frak; Y Paulignan; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching.

Authors:  S R Glover; P Dixon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Motor adaptation to an optical illusion.

Authors:  S Glover; P Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Hitting moving targets: a dissociation between the use of the target's speed and direction of motion.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Tom Middelburg; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Time course of movement planning: selection of handgrips for object manipulation.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum; J Vaughan; H J Barnes; M J Jorgensen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements.

Authors:  G E Stelmach; U Castiello; M Jeannerod
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Likelihood ratios: a simple and flexible statistic for empirical psychologists.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

Review 8.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action.

Authors:  Scott Glover
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.579

9.  Evidence and scientific research.

Authors:  S N Goodman; R Royall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  4 in total

1.  Selection of wrist posture in conditions of motor ambiguity.

Authors:  Daniel K Wood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effect of the "rod-and-frame" illusion on grip planning in a sequential object manipulation task.

Authors:  Céline Crajé; John van der Kamp; Bert Steenbergen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cognitive constraints on motor imagery.

Authors:  Stephan F Dahm; Martina Rieger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-11

4.  Executive functions in motor imagery: support for the motor-cognitive model over the functional equivalence model.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Elys Bibby; Elsa Tuomi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.