Literature DB >> 19705111

Control of interceptive actions is based on expectancy of time to target arrival.

Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto1, Luis Augusto Teixeira.   

Abstract

In this study the hypothesis that interceptive movements are controlled on the basis of expectancy of time to target arrival was tested. The study was conducted through assessment of temporal errors and kinematics of interceptive movements to a moving virtual target. Initial target velocity was kept unchanged in part of the trials, and in the others it was decreased 300 ms before the due time of target arrival at the interception position, increasing in 100 ms time to target arrival. Different probabilities of velocity decrease ranging from 25 to 100% were compared. The results revealed that while there were increasing errors between probabilities of 25 and 75% for unchanged target velocity, the opposite relationship was observed for target velocity decrease. Kinematic analysis indicated that movement timing adjustments to target velocity decrease were made online. These results support the conception that visuomotor integration in the interception of moving targets is mediated by an internal forward model whose weights can be flexibly adjusted according to expectancy of time to target arrival.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19705111     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1987-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  44 in total

1.  Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Gianfranco Bosco; Vincenzo Maffei; Marco Iosa; Yuri P Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Hitting moving targets: a dissociation between the use of the target's speed and direction of motion.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Tom Middelburg; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  When is behavioral data evidence for a control theory? Tau-coupling revisited.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.422

4.  Absolute error revisited: an accuracy indicator in disguise.

Authors:  J A Spray
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Hand, eye, and head coordination while pointing to perturbed targets.

Authors:  H Carnahan; R G Marteniuk
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Internal model of gravity for hand interception: parametric adaptation to zero-gravity visual targets on Earth.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Perception-action coupling and expertise in interceptive actions.

Authors:  Cyrille Le Runigo; Nicolas Benguigui; Benoit G Bardy
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Signal timing across the macaque visual system.

Authors:  M T Schmolesky; Y Wang; D P Hanes; K G Thompson; S Leutgeb; J D Schall; A G Leventhal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Visual reaction time and high-speed ball games.

Authors:  P McLeod
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 10.  Four questions of time to contact: a critical examination of research on interceptive timing.

Authors:  J R Tresilian
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  1 in total

1.  Intercepting moving targets: does memory from practice in a specific condition of target displacement affect movement timing?

Authors:  Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.