Literature DB >> 18936928

Adaptations of lateral hand movements to early and late visual occlusion in catching.

Joost C Dessing1, Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes, C Lieke E Peper, Peter J Beek.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggested that the control of hand movements in catching involves continuous vision-based adjustments. More insight into these adjustments may be gained by examining the effects of occluding different parts of the ball trajectory. Here, we examined the effects of such occlusion on lateral hand movements when catching balls approaching from different directions, with the occlusion conditions presented in blocks or in randomized order. The analyses showed that late occlusion only had an effect during the blocked presentation, and early occlusion only during the randomized presentation. During the randomized presentation movement biases were more leftward if the preceding trial was an early occlusion trial. The effect of early occlusion during the randomized presentation suggests that the observed leftward movement bias relates to the rightward visual acceleration inherent to the ball trajectories used, while its absence during the blocked presentation seems to reflect trial-by-trial adaptations in the visuomotor gain, reminiscent of dynamic gain control in the smooth pursuit system. The movement biases during the late occlusion block were interpreted in terms of an incomplete motion extrapolation--a reduction of the velocity gain--caused by the fact that participants never saw the to-be-extrapolated part of the ball trajectory. These results underscore that continuous movement adjustments for catching do not only depend on visual information, but also on visuomotor adaptations based on non-visual information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18936928     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1588-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  68 in total

1.  Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Gianfranco Bosco; Vincenzo Maffei; Marco Iosa; Yuri P Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Visual processing of optic acceleration.

Authors:  P Werkhoven; H P Snippe; A Toet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Hitting moving targets: a dissociation between the use of the target's speed and direction of motion.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Tom Middelburg; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Movement reversals in ball catching.

Authors:  G Montagne; M Laurent; A Durey; R Bootsma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Independent coactivation of shoulder and elbow muscles.

Authors:  P L Gribble; D J Ostry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visual reaction time and high-speed ball games.

Authors:  P McLeod
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Anticipatory and reflex coactivation of antagonist muscles in catching.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; C Maioli
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1987-03-17       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Adaptation to suppression of visual information during catching.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; C Maioli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Target interception: hand-eye coordination and strategies.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; John F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  16 in total

1.  Extrapolation of vertical target motion through a brief visual occlusion.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Marco Iosa; Vincenzo Maffei; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Familiar trajectories facilitate the interpretation of physical forces when intercepting a moving target.

Authors:  Antonija Mijatović; Barbara La Scaleia; Nicola Mercuri; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differential contributions to the interception of occluded ballistic trajectories by the temporoparietal junction, area hMT/V5+, and the intraparietal cortex.

Authors:  Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action.

Authors:  Huaiyong Zhao; William H Warren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  To know or not to know: influence of explicit advance knowledge of occlusion on interceptive actions.

Authors:  Pieter Tijtgat; Simon J Bennett; Geert J P Savelsbergh; Dirk De Clercq; Matthieu Lenoir
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visuomotor transformation for interception: catching while fixating.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; C E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Catching what we can't see: manual interception of occluded fly-ball trajectories.

Authors:  Gianfranco Bosco; Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Bending it like Beckham: how to visually fool the goalkeeper.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Cathy M Craig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Filling gaps in visual motion for target capture.

Authors:  Gianfranco Bosco; Sergio Delle Monache; Silvio Gravano; Iole Indovina; Barbara La Scaleia; Vincenzo Maffei; Myrka Zago; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-23

10.  The role of areas MT+/V5 and SPOC in spatial and temporal control of manual interception: an rTMS study.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Michael Vesia; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.