Literature DB >> 12795489

Locomotion, incidental learning, and the selection of spatial reference systems.

Christine M Valiquette1, Timothy P McNamara, Keith Smith.   

Abstract

In three experiments, we examined the effects of locomotion and incidental learning on the formation of spatial memories. Participants learned the locations of objects in a room and then made judgments of relative direction, using their memories (e.g., "Imagine you are standing at the clock, facing the jar. Point to the book"). The experiments manipulated the number of headings experienced, the amount of interaction with the objects, and whether the participants were informed that their memories of the layout would be tested. When participants were required to maintain a constant body orientation during learning (Experiment 1), they represented the layout in terms of a single reference direction parallel to that orientation. When they were allowed to move freely in the room (Experiment 2), they seemed to use two orthogonal reference axes aligned with the walls of the enclosing room. Extensive movement under incidental learning conditions (Experiment 3) yielded a mixture of these two encoding strategies across participants. There was no evidence that locomotion, interaction with objects, or incidental learning led to the formation of spatial memories that differed from those formed from static viewing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12795489     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  View dependence in scene recognition after active learning.

Authors:  C G Christou; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

2.  Gender-linked differences in the incidental memory of children and adults.

Authors:  I D Cherney; B O Ryalls
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1999-04

3.  Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory.

Authors:  Weimin Mou; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The role of self-to-object updating in orientation-free performance on spatial-memory tasks.

Authors:  M Jeanne Sholl; Genevieve P Bartels
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts.

Authors:  David Waller; Daniel R Montello; Anthony E Richardson; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.

Authors:  J J Rieser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Visual memories from nonvisual experiences.

Authors:  A L Shelton; T P McNamara
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-07

Review 8.  How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain?

Authors:  H H Bülthoff; S Y Edelman; M J Tarr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Updating after rotational and translational body movements: coordinate structure of perspective space.

Authors:  C C Presson; D R Montello
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

2.  Isolating observer-based reference directions in human spatial memory: head, body, and the self-to-array axis.

Authors:  David Waller; Yvonne Lippa; Adam Richardson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-02-20

3.  Reference frames in spatial updating when body-based cues are absent.

Authors:  Qiliang He; Timothy P McNamara; Jonathan W Kelly
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-01

4.  Biased representations of the spatial structure of navigable environments.

Authors:  Christine M Valiquette; Timothy P McNamara; Jennifer S Labrecque
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-07

5.  Object location memory: the interplay of multiple representations.

Authors:  Hongbin Wang; Todd R Johnson; Yanlong Sun; Jiajie Zhang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-10

6.  Representations of interobject spatial relations in long-term memory.

Authors:  Björn Rump; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-02

7.  Different mental representations for place recognition and goal localization.

Authors:  Christine Valiquette; Timoth P McNamara
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

8.  Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space.

Authors:  Timothy P McNamara; Björn Rump; Steffen Werner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

9.  From objects to landmarks: the function of visual location information in spatial navigation.

Authors:  Edgar Chan; Oliver Baumann; Mark A Bellgrove; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-27

10.  When do objects become landmarks? A VR study of the effect of task relevance on spatial memory.

Authors:  Xue Han; Patrick Byrne; Michael Kahana; Suzanna Becker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.