Literature DB >> 17972732

Different mental representations for place recognition and goal localization.

Christine Valiquette1, Timoth P McNamara.   

Abstract

Determining one's current location and locating a goal relative to one's position are important components of successful human navigation in familiar environments. Several prominent cognitive theories of human spatial memory (e.g., McNamara, 2003; Sholl, 2001; Wang & Spelke, 2002) assume that both behaviors access the same enduring mental representations of the environment. Participants in the present experiment learned the locations of seven objects within a room from two views, and were then tested in a separate room using scene recognition and judgments of relative direction (JRD). Scene recognition results indicated that two viewer-centered representations of the layout of objects were preserved in long-term memory, whereas JRD showed evidence of a single orientation-dependent long-term mental representation. The challenges of incorporating the present findings into existing theories of human spatial memory are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17972732     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory.

Authors:  Weimin Mou; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex.

Authors:  Russell Epstein; Kim S Graham; Paul E Downing
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Orientation and perspective dependence in route and survey learning.

Authors:  Amy L Shelton; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Visual memories from nonvisual experiences.

Authors:  A L Shelton; T P McNamara
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-07

5.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Human spatial representation: insights from animals.

Authors:  Ranxiao Wang; Elizabeth Spelke
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Associative recognition in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions and relatively normal item recognition.

Authors:  A R Mayes; J S Holdstock; C L Isaac; D Montaldi; J Grigor; A Gummer; P Cariga; J J Downes; D Tsivilis; D Gaffan; Qiyong Gong; K A Norman
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Spatial memory and perspective taking.

Authors:  Amy L Shelton; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04

9.  Allocentric spatial memory activation of the hippocampal formation measured with fMRI.

Authors:  David M Parslow; David Rose; Barbara Brooks; Simon Fleminger; Jeffrey A Gray; Vincent Giampietro; Michael J Brammer; Steven Williams; David Gasston; Christopher Andrew; Goparlen N Vythelingum; Glafkos Loannou; Andrew Simmons; Robin G Morris
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Human hippocampus and viewpoint dependence in spatial memory.

Authors:  John A King; Neil Burgess; Tom Hartley; Faraneh Vargha-Khadem; John O'Keefe
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.899

View more
  11 in total

1.  The integration of spatial information across different viewpoints.

Authors:  Tobias Meilinger; Alain Berthoz; Jan M Wiener
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-08

2.  Where you are affects what you can easily imagine: Environmental geometry elicits sensorimotor interference in remote perspective taking.

Authors:  Bernhard E Riecke; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-08-09

3.  Spatial memory in the real world: long-term representations of everyday environments.

Authors:  Steven A Marchette; Ashok Yerramsetti; Thomas J Burns; Amy L Shelton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-11

4.  Subspecialization in the human posterior medial cortex.

Authors:  Danilo Bzdok; Adrian Heeger; Robert Langner; Angela R Laird; Peter T Fox; Nicola Palomero-Gallagher; Brent A Vogt; Karl Zilles; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Objects exhibit body model like shape distortions.

Authors:  Aurelie Saulton; Trevor J Dodds; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Stephan de la Rosa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Verbal shadowing and visual interference in spatial memory.

Authors:  Tobias Meilinger; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Reference frames in allocentric representations are invariant across static and active encoding.

Authors:  Edgar Chan; Oliver Baumann; Mark A Bellgrove; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-28

9.  From objects to landmarks: the function of visual location information in spatial navigation.

Authors:  Edgar Chan; Oliver Baumann; Mark A Bellgrove; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-27

10.  When do objects become landmarks? A VR study of the effect of task relevance on spatial memory.

Authors:  Xue Han; Patrick Byrne; Michael Kahana; Suzanna Becker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.