Literature DB >> 7613080

How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain?

H H Bülthoff1, S Y Edelman, M J Tarr.   

Abstract

In this report we discuss a variety of psychophysical experiments that explore different aspects of the problem of object recognition and representation in human vision. In all experiments, subjects were presented with realistically rendered images of computer-generated 3D objects, with tight control over stimulus shape, surface properties, illumination, and viewpoint, as well as subjects' prior exposure to the stimulus objects. Contrary to the predictions of the paradigmatic theory of recognition, which holds that object representations are viewpoint invariant, performance in all experiments was consistently viewpoint dependent, was only partially aided by binocular stereo and other depth information, was specific to viewpoints that were familiar, and was systematically disrupted by rotation in depth more than by deforming the 2D images of the stimuli. The emerging concept of multiple-views representation supported by these results is consistent with recently advanced computational theories of recognition based on view interpolation. Moreover, in several simulated experiments employing the same stimuli used in experiments with human subjects, models based on multiple-views representations replicated many of the psychophysical results concerning the observed pattern of human performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7613080     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/5.3.247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  44 in total

1.  View dependence in scene recognition after active learning.

Authors:  C G Christou; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

2.  Macaque inferior temporal neurons are selective for disparity-defined three-dimensional shapes.

Authors:  P Janssen; R Vogels; G A Orban
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Testing instance models of face repetition priming.

Authors:  D C Hay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

Review 4.  A theory of geometric constraints on neural activity for natural three-dimensional movement.

Authors:  K Zhang; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  To see and remember: visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes.

Authors:  A Hollingworth; C C Williams; J M Henderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

6.  Extrapolating spatial layout in scene representations.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

7.  Novel interaction techniques for neurosurgical planning and stereotactic navigation.

Authors:  Alark Joshi; Dustin Scheinost; Kenneth P Vives; Dennis D Spencer; Lawrence H Staib; Xenophon Papademetris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.579

8.  Measuring sensitivity to viewpoint change with and without stereoscopic cues.

Authors:  Jason Bell; Edwin Dickinson; David R Badcock; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  For the mind's eye the world is two-dimensional.

Authors:  Janek S Lobmaier; Fred W Mast; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

10.  View combination in scene recognition.

Authors:  Alinda Friedman; David Waller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.