Literature DB >> 10586576

View dependence in scene recognition after active learning.

C G Christou1, H H Bülthoff.   

Abstract

Human spatial encoding of three-dimensional navigable space was studied, using a virtual environment simulation. This allowed subjects to become familiar with a realistic scene by making simulated rotational and translational movements during training. Subsequent tests determined whether subjects could generalize their recognition ability by identifying novel-perspective views and topographic floor plans of the scene. Results from picture recognition tests showed that familiar direction views were most easily recognized, although significant generalization to novel views was observed. Topographic floor plans were also easily identified. In further experiments, novel-view performance diminished when active training was replaced by passive viewing of static images of the scene. However, the ability to make self-initiated movements, as opposed to watching dynamic movie sequences, had no effect on performance. These results suggest that representation of navigable space is view dependent and highlight the importance of spatial-temporal continuity during learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10586576     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

1.  Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  M J Tarr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-03

2.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  T Poggio; S Edelman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent.

Authors:  B Roskos-Ewoldsen; T P McNamara; A L Shelton; W Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.

Authors:  J J Rieser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain?

Authors:  H H Bülthoff; S Y Edelman; M J Tarr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance.

Authors:  I Biederman; P C Gerhardstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Spatial knowledge of young and elderly adults: scene recognition from familiar and novel perspectives.

Authors:  P R Bruce; J F Herman
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.645

9.  Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation.

Authors:  P W Thorndyke; B Hayes-Roth
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Knowing where things are parahippocampal involvement in encoding object locations in virtual large-scale space.

Authors:  E A Maguire; C D Frith; N Burgess; J G Donnett; J O'Keefe
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

2.  A body-centred frame of reference drives spatial priming in visual search.

Authors:  Keira Ball; Daniel Smith; Amanda Ellison; Thomas Schenk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Extrapolating spatial layout in scene representations.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

4.  Visual and haptic representations of scenes are updated with observer movement.

Authors:  Achille Pasqualotto; Ciara M Finucane; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Representational momentum in scenes: learning spatial layout.

Authors:  Margaret P Munger; Matthew C Dellinger; Travis G Lloyd; Katherine Johnson-Reid; Nicole J Tonelli; Katharine Wolf; Jason M Scott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

6.  Egocentric and nonegocentric coding in memory for spatial layout: evidence from scene recognition.

Authors:  David Waller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

7.  Updating representations of learned scenes.

Authors:  Cory A Finlay; Michael A Motes; Maria Kozhevnikov
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-10-19

8.  The integration of spatial information across different viewpoints.

Authors:  Tobias Meilinger; Alain Berthoz; Jan M Wiener
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-08

9.  Novel-view scene recognition relies on identifying spatial reference directions.

Authors:  Weimin Mou; Hui Zhang; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-03-17

10.  Intrinsic orientation and study viewpoint in recognizing spatial structure of a shape.

Authors:  Xiaoou Li; Weimin Mou; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.