Literature DB >> 16957954

Biased representations of the spatial structure of navigable environments.

Christine M Valiquette1, Timothy P McNamara, Jennifer S Labrecque.   

Abstract

Recent studies (e.g., Shelton & McNamara in Cognitive Psychology, 43(4), 274-310, 2001; Valiquette, McNamara, & Smith in Memory and Cognition, 31(3), 479-489, 2003) have demonstrated that judgments of relative direction (JRD) access a single enduring orientation-dependent allocentric representation of the layout of objects in an environment, regardless of whether the space is viewed from one or multiple vantage points. Two experiments tested the limits of this phenomenon. In both experiments participants learned the locations of objects in a large room from two views: one view was aligned with salient environmental frames of reference (edges of the mat on which objects were placed and walls of the enclosing room) and expected to be preserved in long-term memory; the other view was misaligned and not expected to be preserved in long-term memory. The first experiment demonstrated that performing JRD between studying the misaligned view and studying the aligned view did not result in the misaligned view being maintained in long-term memory. The second experiment demonstrated that after studying the layout extensively from the misaligned view, 30 s of exposure to the aligned view (with no instructions to learn the layout from that view) resulted in the aligned but not the misaligned view being preserved in long-term memory. These findings indicate that the human spatial memory and navigation system is strongly biased to represent the spatial structure of navigable environments with reference directions or axes that are aligned with salient environmental frames of reference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16957954     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0084-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  12 in total

1.  Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory.

Authors:  Weimin Mou; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.

Authors:  J J Rieser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Orientation-specificity in kinesthetic spatial learning: the role of multiple orientations.

Authors:  C C Presson; N DeLange; M D Hazelrigg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

4.  Systems of spatial reference in human memory.

Authors:  A L Shelton; T P McNamara
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments.

Authors:  A E Richardson; D R Montello; M Hegarty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

7.  Updating egocentric representations in human navigation.

Authors:  R F Wang; E S Spelke
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-12-15

8.  Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories.

Authors:  Weimin Mou; Timothy P McNamara; Christine M Valiquette; Bjorn Rump
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Updating after rotational and translational body movements: coordinate structure of perspective space.

Authors:  C C Presson; D R Montello
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space.

Authors:  Timothy P McNamara; Björn Rump; Steffen Werner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09
View more
  9 in total

1.  Spatial memories of virtual environments: how egocentric experience, intrinsic structure, and extrinsic structure interact.

Authors:  Jonathan W Kelly; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

2.  How different spatial representations interact in virtual environments: the role of mental frame syncing.

Authors:  Silvia Serino; Giuseppe Riva
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-02-07

3.  Integrating spatial information across experiences.

Authors:  Nathan Greenauer; Catherine Mello; Jonathan W Kelly; Marios N Avraamides
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-09-01

4.  Reference frames during the acquisition and development of spatial memories.

Authors:  Jonathan W Kelly; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-06-29

5.  Landmarks in nature to support wayfinding: the effects of seasons and experimental methods.

Authors:  Pyry Kettunen; Katja Irvankoski; Christina M Krause; L Tiina Sarjakoski
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-02-08

6.  Reference frames in allocentric representations are invariant across static and active encoding.

Authors:  Edgar Chan; Oliver Baumann; Mark A Bellgrove; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-28

7.  Guidance of Navigating Honeybees by Learned Elongated Ground Structures.

Authors:  Randolf Menzel; Lea Tison; Johannes Fischer-Nakai; James Cheeseman; Maria Sol Balbuena; Xiuxian Chen; Tim Landgraf; Julian Petrasch; Johannes Polster; Uwe Greggers
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  When do objects become landmarks? A VR study of the effect of task relevance on spatial memory.

Authors:  Xue Han; Patrick Byrne; Michael Kahana; Suzanna Becker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cross-sensory reference frame transfer in spatial memory: the case of proprioceptive learning.

Authors:  Marios N Avraamides; Mikaella Sarrou; Jonathan W Kelly
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.