Literature DB >> 25315358

Reverse correlation analysis of auditory-nerve fiber responses to broadband noise in a bird, the barn owl.

Bertrand Fontaine1, Christine Köppl, Jose L Peña.   

Abstract

While the barn owl has been extensively used as a model for sound localization and temporal coding, less is known about the mechanisms at its sensory organ, the basilar papilla (homologous to the mammalian cochlea). In this paper, we characterize, for the first time in the avian system, the auditory nerve fiber responses to broadband noise using reverse correlation. We use the derived impulse responses to study the processing of sounds in the cochlea of the barn owl. We characterize the frequency tuning, phase, instantaneous frequency, and relationship to input level of impulse responses. We show that, even features as complex as the phase dependence on input level, can still be consistent with simple linear filtering. Where possible, we compare our results with mammalian data. We identify salient differences between the barn owl and mammals, e.g., a much smaller frequency glide slope and a bimodal impulse response for the barn owl, and discuss what they might indicate about cochlear mechanics. While important for research on the avian auditory system, the results from this paper also allow us to examine hypotheses put forward for the mammalian cochlea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25315358      PMCID: PMC4310858          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0494-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  48 in total

1.  A compressive gammachirp auditory filter for both physiological and psychophysical data.

Authors:  T Irino; R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Frequency glides in click responses of the basilar membrane and auditory nerve: their scaling behavior and origin in traveling-wave dispersion.

Authors:  C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Tuning and timing in the gerbil ear: Wiener-kernel analysis.

Authors:  Edwin R Lewis; Kenneth R Henry; Walter M Yamada
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers. II. Nonlinear tuning with a frequency glide.

Authors:  Qing Tan; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Cochlear phase and amplitude retrieved from the auditory nerve at arbitrary frequencies.

Authors:  Marcel van der Heijden; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Time-frequency analysis of auditory-nerve-fiber and basilar-membrane click responses reveal glide irregularities and non-characteristic-frequency skirts.

Authors:  Tai Lin; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Temporal position of discharges in single auditory nerve fibers within the cycle of a sine-wave stimulus: frequency and intensity effects.

Authors:  D J Anderson; J E Rose; J E Hind; J F Brugge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Cross-correlation in the auditory coincidence detectors of owls.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; G Björn Christianson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Variation in the phase of response to low-frequency pure tones in the guinea pig auditory nerve as functions of stimulus level and frequency.

Authors:  Alan R Palmer; Trevor M Shackleton
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  Multidimensional stimulus encoding in the auditory nerve of the barn owl.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Jacob L Wydick; Christine Köppl; José L Peña
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Hair cell force generation does not amplify or tune vibrations within the chicken basilar papilla.

Authors:  Anping Xia; Xiaofang Liu; Patrick D Raphael; Brian E Applegate; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 14.919

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.