Literature DB >> 12734684

Implant-related complications in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: meta-analysis of dynamic screw-plate versus dynamic screw-intramedullary nail devices.

L Audigé1, B Hanson, M F Swiontkowski.   

Abstract

The choice between dynamic screw-intramedullary nail (DSIN) devices and dynamic screw-plate (DSP) devices for the fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures remains controversial. This study presents a meta-analysis of fixation failures in unstable trochanteric femoral fractures using DSP devices or DSIN devices. Two independent assessors selected randomised controlled trials using a range of electronic databases, as well as reference lists of selected articles. A study quality checklist was used. The occurrence of fixation failure, in particular cut-out, was the primary subject of analysis using descriptive statistics and random-effect meta-analyses. Seventeen trials were identified. Meta-analyses showed no significant difference in the frequency of implant-related complications between the two types of devices. Iatrogenic femoral fractures associated with the use of DSIN devices represent a rare, but persistent, risk. There was a tendency for less frequent cut-out with intramedullary devices compared with DSP devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12734684      PMCID: PMC3458474          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-003-0457-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  18 in total

1.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  M R Baumgaertner; S L Curtin; D M Lindskog
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Classic nail versus DHS. A prospective randomised study of fixation of trochanteric femur fractures].

Authors:  R Hoffmann; G Schmidmaier; R Schulz; M Schütz; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Authors:  C I Adams; C M Robinson; C M Court-Brown; M M McQueen
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 4.  Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.

Authors:  M J Parker; H H Handoll
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

5.  Intramedullary hip screw versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  P Harrington; A Nihal; A K Singhania; F R Howell
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Treatment of intertrochanteric fracture with the Gamma AP locking nail or by a compression hip screw--a randomised prospective trial.

Authors:  S R Park; J S Kang; H S Kim; W H Lee; Y H Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Postoperative improvement of walking capacity in patients with trochanteric hip fracture: a prospective analysis 3 and 6 months after surgery.

Authors:  G Walheim; C Barrios; A Stark; L A Broström; E Olsson
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. A prospective, randomized study of one hundred patients.

Authors:  D C Hardy; P Y Descamps; P Krallis; L Fabeck; P Smets; C L Bertens; P E Delince
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw.

Authors:  J E Madsen; L Naess; A K Aune; A Alho; A Ekeland; K Strømsøe
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  A randomized study of the compression hip screw and Gamma nail in 426 fractures.

Authors:  Leif Ahrengart; Hans Törnkvist; Per Fornander; Karl-Göran Thorngren; Lauri Pasanen; Per Wahlström; Seppo Honkonen; Urban Lindgren
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  28 in total

1.  [Treatment results after cemented hemiprosthesis for care of unstable pertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  S Grote; F Stegmeyer; V Bogner; P Biberthaler; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Best practices for elderly hip fracture patients. A systematic overview of the evidence.

Authors:  Lauren A Beaupre; C Allyson Jones; L Duncan Saunders; D William C Johnston; Jeanette Buckingham; Sumit R Majumdar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Comparison of accuracy of lag screw placement in cephalocondylic nails and sliding hip screw plate fixation for extracapsular fractures of the neck of femur.

Authors:  A J Shyam Kumar; V Parmar; J Bankart; S C Williams; W M Harper
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with posterior comminution: a biomechanical comparison of DHS® and Intertan nail®.

Authors:  Martin Rupprecht; Lars Grossterlinden; Kai Sellenschloh; Michael Hoffmann; Klaus Püschel; Michael Morlock; Johannes M Rueger; Wolfgang Lehmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Is helical blade nailing superior to locked minimally invasive plating in unstable pertrochanteric fractures?

Authors:  Matthias Knobe; Wolf Drescher; Nicole Heussen; Richard Martin Sellei; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving 3,279 fractures.

Authors:  Henry Wynn Jones; Philip Johnston; Martyn Parker
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Best one hundred papers of International Orthopaedics: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Georgios N Panagopoulos; Cyril Mauffrey; Andrew Quaile; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures: is there a consensus on definition and treatment in Germany?

Authors:  Matthias Knobe; Gertraud Gradl; Andreas Ladenburger; Ivan S Tarkin; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A surrogate long-bone model with osteoporotic material properties for biomechanical testing of fracture implants.

Authors:  Mark B Sommers; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Steven M Madey; Corey Vande Zanderschulp; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Comparison of migration behavior between single and dual lag screw implants for intertrochanteric fracture fixation.

Authors:  George K Kouvidis; Mark B Sommers; Peter V Giannoudis; Pavlos G Katonis; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.