Literature DB >> 21286918

Internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with posterior comminution: a biomechanical comparison of DHS® and Intertan nail®.

Martin Rupprecht1, Lars Grossterlinden, Kai Sellenschloh, Michael Hoffmann, Klaus Püschel, Michael Morlock, Johannes M Rueger, Wolfgang Lehmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Internal fixation is a therapeutic mainstay for treatment of undisplaced femoral neck fractures and fractures without posterior comminution. The best treatment for unstable and comminuted fractures, however, remains controversial, especially in older patients. The present study was designed to assess the utility of the Intertan Nail® (IT) for stabilization of comminuted Pauwels type III fractures compared to dynamic hips screw (DHS).
METHODS: Randomized on the basis of bone mineral density, 32 human femurs were assigned to four groups. Pauwels type III fractures were osteomized with a custom-made saw guide. In 16 specimens the posteromedial support was removed and all femurs were instrumented with an IT or a DHS. All constructs were tested with nondestructive axial loading to 700N, cyclical compression to 1,400N (10,000 cycles), and loading to failure. Outcome measures included number of survived cycles, mechanical stiffness, head displacement and load to failure.
RESULTS: Postoperative mechanical stiffness and stiffness after cyclical loading were significantly reduced in all constructs regardless of the presence of a comminution defect (p = 0.02). Specimens stabilized with the IT had a lower construct displacement (IT, 8.5 ± 0.5 mm vs. DHS, 14.5 ± 2.2 mm; p = 0.007) and sustained higher failure loads (IT, 4929 ± 419 N vs. DHS, 3505 ± 453 N; p = 0.036) than the DHS constructs.
INTERPRETATION: In comminuted Pauwels type III fractures, the fixation with the IT provided sufficient postoperative mechanical strength, comparable rate of femoral head displacement, and a similar tolerance of physiological loads compared to fractures without comminution. The absence of the posteromedial support in comminuted fractures tended to reduce the failure load regardless of the fixation method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21286918      PMCID: PMC3193951          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1199-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  23 in total

1.  Intramedullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: one or two lag screws.

Authors:  Erik N Kubiak; Mathew Bong; Samuel S Park; Fred Kummer; Kenneth Egol; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Hip mechanics.

Authors:  R A DENHAM
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1959-08

3.  Peripheral quantitative computed tomography in human long bones: evaluation of in vitro and in vivo precision.

Authors:  H Sievänen; V Koskue; A Rauhio; P Kannus; A Heinonen; I Vuori
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Awareness of tip-apex distance reduces failure of fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hip.

Authors:  M R Baumgaertner; B D Solberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-11

5.  Internal forces and moments in the femur during walking.

Authors:  G N Duda; E Schneider; E Y Chao
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports.

Authors:  G L Lu-Yao; R B Keller; B Littenberg; J E Wennberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Bone mineral content and fixation strength of femoral neck fractures. A cadaver study.

Authors:  A Sjöstedt; C Zetterberg; T Hansson; E Hult; L Ekström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1994-04

8.  Treatment of femoral neck fractures with the sliding compression screw.

Authors:  F D Rau; A Manoli; L G Morawa
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The significance of posterior comminution in femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  M Scheck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Undisplaced intracapsular hip fractures: results of internal fixation in 375 patients.

Authors:  Kevin S Conn; Martyn J Parker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  16 in total

1.  Screw-blade fixation systems in Pauwels three femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  Matthias Knobe; Simon Altgassen; Klaus-Jürgen Maier; Gertraud Gradl-Dietsch; Chris Kaczmarek; Sven Nebelung; Kajetan Klos; Bong-Sung Kim; Boyko Gueorguiev; Klemens Horst; Benjamin Buecking
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Surgical treatment options for femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Boris A Zelle; Luis M Salazar; Shain L Howard; Kisan Parikh; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Yanfeng Huang; Chunlin Zhang; Yi Luo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Clinical and functional outcomes of internal fixation with intertrochanteric antegrade nail in older patients with proximal extracapsular femoral fractures.

Authors:  M Galli; V Ciriello; L Bocchino; N M Gangemi; M Peruzzi; E Marzetti
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  What is the risk of stress risers for interprosthetic fractures of the femur? A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lehmann; Martin Rupprecht; Jacob Nuechtern; Daniel Melzner; Kai Sellenschloh; Jan Kolb; Florian Fensky; Michael Hoffmann; Klaus Püschel; Michael Morlock; Johannes M Rueger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  InterTan nail versus Gamma3 nail for intramedullary nailing of unstable trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Dankai Wu; Guangkai Ren; Chuangang Peng; Xuanlin Zheng; Fengmin Mao; Yueyang Zhang
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  Statistical consequences of using bone mineral density to pair cadaver femurs in comparative ex vivo hip fracture studies.

Authors:  T Basso; J Klaksvik; O A Foss
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.853

8.  Optimizing stability in AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric fracture fixation in older patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Bo Xu; Guanzhao Liang; Xianshang Zeng; Dan Zeng; Deng Chen; Zhe Ge; Weiguang Yu; Xinchao Zhang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Comparison of Three Fixation Methods for Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults: Experimental and Numerical Investigations.

Authors:  Shabnam Samsami; Sadegh Saberi; Sanambar Sadighi; Gholamreza Rouhi
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 1.553

10.  A retrospective analysis of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation-Asia in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Weiguang Yu; Xinchao Zhang; Xingfei Zhu; Jun Hu; Yunjiang Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.