Literature DB >> 10232034

[Classic nail versus DHS. A prospective randomised study of fixation of trochanteric femur fractures].

R Hoffmann1, G Schmidmaier, R Schulz, M Schütz, N P Südkamp.   

Abstract

The intramedullary hip screw system Classic-Nail and the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) were evaluated in a prospective-randomized clinical trial for operative treatment of trochanteric femur fractures. Hundred and ten geriatric patients (mean age 82 years) were runningly included in the study (56 Classic Nail, 54 DHS). No significant differences between the two study groups were observed with regard to treatment and follow-up data. With the Classic-Nail one complete femur shaft fracture and one incomplete fracture occurred at the tip of the nail intraoperatively and could successfully be fixed with cerclage wires. In the DHS group two patients underwent reoperation for significant loss of reduction early postoperatively. At an average follow-up of 3.7 months all fractures were healed with no difference in functional outcome between the two groups.--Classic Nail and DHS both lead to equally good results in the operative treatment of trochanteric femur fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10232034     DOI: 10.1007/s001130050391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  9 in total

Review 1.  Extracts from "clinical evidence": hip fracture.

Authors:  W J Gillespie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-21

2.  Implant-related complications in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: meta-analysis of dynamic screw-plate versus dynamic screw-intramedullary nail devices.

Authors:  L Audigé; B Hanson; M F Swiontkowski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Pertrochanteric fractures. What impact do surgical timing and implant choice have on the outcome?].

Authors:  T Kostuj; R Smektala; U Schulze-Raestrup; C Müller-Mai
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; Joseph Lewis; Jamie Stokes; James R Gill; Jonathan A Cook; William Gp Eardley; Martyn J Parker; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 5.  Cephalomedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in older adults.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; James R Gill; Martyn J Parker; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-26

Review 6.  Influence of osteoporosis on fracture fixation--a systematic literature review.

Authors:  J Goldhahn; N Suhm; S Goldhahn; M Blauth; B Hanson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Favorable radiographic outcomes using the expandable proximal femoral nail in the treatment of hip fractures - A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ofir Chechik; Eyal Amar; Morsi Khashan; Tamir Pritsch; Michael Drexler; Yariv Goldstein; Ely L Steinberg
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-05-10

8.  Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study.

Authors:  Gursimrat Singh Cheema; Amit Rastogi; Vakil Singh; Satish Chandra Goel; Diwakar Mishra; Sumit Arora
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Presence of a nail in the medullary canal; is it enough to prevent femoral neck shortening in trochanteric fracture?

Authors:  Hyung Keun Song; Han Kuk Yoon; Kyu Hyun Yang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.759

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.