Literature DB >> 17572432

A surrogate long-bone model with osteoporotic material properties for biomechanical testing of fracture implants.

Mark B Sommers1, Daniel C Fitzpatrick, Steven M Madey, Corey Vande Zanderschulp, Michael Bottlang.   

Abstract

In vitro comparative testing of fracture fixation implants is limited by the highly variable material properties of cadaveric bone. Bone surrogate specimens are often employed to avoid this confounding variable. Although validated surrogate models of normal bone (NB) exist, no validated bone model simulating weak, osteoporotic bone (OPB) is available. This study presents an osteoporotic long-bone model designed to match the lower cumulative range of mechanical properties found in large series of cadaveric femora reported in the literature. Five key structural properties were identified from the literature: torsional rigidity and strength, bending rigidity and strength, and screw pull-out strength. An OPB surrogate was designed to meet the low range for each of these parameters, and was mechanically tested. For comparison, the same parameters were determined for surrogates of NB. The OPB surrogate had a torsional rigidity and torsional strength within the lower 2% and 16%, respectively, of the literature based cumulative range reported for cadaveric femurs. Its bending rigidity and bending strength was within the lower 11% and 8% of the literature-based range, respectively. Its pull-out strength was within the lower 2% to 16% of the literature based range. With all five structural properties being within the lower 16% of the cumulative range reported for native femurs, the OPB surrogate reflected the diminished structural properties seen in osteoporotic femora. In comparison, surrogates of NB demonstrated structural properties within 23-118% of the literature-based range. These results support the need and utility of the OPB surrogate for comparative testing of implants for fixation of femoral shaft fractures in OPB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17572432      PMCID: PMC2095778          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  34 in total

1.  Effect of cutting flute design on cortical bone screw insertion torque and pullout strength.

Authors:  S Yerby; C C Scott; N J Evans; K L Messing; D R Carter
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Experimental determination of bone cortex holding power of orthopedic screw.

Authors:  R Bolliger Neto; J D Rossi; T P Leivas
Journal:  Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

3.  Structural properties of a new design of composite replicate femurs and tibias.

Authors:  A D Heiner; T D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures.

Authors:  A Marti; C Fankhauser; A Frenk; J Cordey; B Gasser
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Implant-related complications in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: meta-analysis of dynamic screw-plate versus dynamic screw-intramedullary nail devices.

Authors:  L Audigé; B Hanson; M F Swiontkowski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue.

Authors:  Harun H Bayraktar; Elise F Morgan; Glen L Niebur; Grayson E Morris; Eric K Wong; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Dynamic bending tolerance and elastic-plastic material properties of the human femur.

Authors:  J R Funk; J R Kerrigan; J R Crandall
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2004

8.  Regional differences in mechanical and material properties of femoral head cancellous bone in health and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  S J Brown; P Pollintine; D E Powell; M W J Davie; C A Sharp
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2002-08-12       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  A prospective, randomized trial comparing the limited contact dynamic compression plate with the point contact fixator for forearm fractures.

Authors:  Frankie Leung; Shew-Ping Chow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Unstable proximal extraarticular tibia fractures: a biomechanical evaluation of four methods of fixation.

Authors:  Richard D Peindl; Robert D Zura; Andrew Vincent; Edward R Coley; Michael J Bosse; Stephen H Sims
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.512

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of construct stiffness on healing of fractures stabilized with locking plates.

Authors:  Michael Bottlang; Josef Doornink; Trevor J Lujan; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; J Lawrence Marsh; Peter Augat; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Maren Lesser; Steven M Madey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Relative stability of conventional and locked plating fixation in a model of the osteoporotic femoral diaphysis.

Authors:  Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Josef Doornink; Steven M Madey; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Far cortical locking can reduce stiffness of locked plating constructs while retaining construct strength.

Authors:  Michael Bottlang; Josef Doornink; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Steven M Madey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Compressive properties of commercially available polyurethane foams as mechanical models for osteoporotic human cancellous bone.

Authors:  Purvi S D Patel; Duncan E T Shepherd; David W L Hukins
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.