Literature DB >> 9553538

Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures.

M R Baumgaertner1, S L Curtin, D M Lindskog.   

Abstract

One hundred thirty-one patients (135 fractures) who sustained an intertrochanteric fracture were assigned randomly to treatment with either a sliding hip screw or an intramedullary hip screw and followed up prospectively. In patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures, the intramedullary device was associated with 23% less surgical time and 44% less blood loss; however, use of the intramedullary hip screw in patients who had a stable fracture pattern required 70% greater fluoroscopic time. Intraoperative complications occurred exclusively in patients in the intramedullary hip screw group. There were no differences in the rates of functional recovery between the two fixation groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9553538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  60 in total

1.  Short-term and long-term orthopaedic issues in patients with fragility fractures.

Authors:  Susan V Bukata; Stephen L Kates; Regis J O'Keefe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Implant-related complications in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: meta-analysis of dynamic screw-plate versus dynamic screw-intramedullary nail devices.

Authors:  L Audigé; B Hanson; M F Swiontkowski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The treatment of transtrochanteric fractures of the femur with a minimally invasive technique using an extramedullary implant MINUS System.

Authors:  Rogério Naim Sawaia; William Dias Belangero
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving 3,279 fractures.

Authors:  Henry Wynn Jones; Philip Johnston; Martyn Parker
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  A comparison of two fixation methods for femoral trochanteric fractures: a new generation intramedullary system vs sliding hip screw.

Authors:  Christian Carulli; Federico Piacentini; Tommaso Paoli; Roberto Civinini; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-05-30

6.  Letter regarding article by Li AB et al.: intramedullary and extramedullary fixations for the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hong-Bin Guo; Hong-Bo He
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a comparison of two implant designs.

Authors:  Nicolas E Efstathopoulos; Vassilios S Nikolaou; John T Lazarettos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur: a standard or long nail?

Authors:  Güvenir Okcu; Nadir Ozkayin; Cemil Okta; Ismet Topcu; Kemal Aktuglu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre.

Authors:  Alicja J Bojan; Claudia Beimel; Andreas Speitling; Gilbert Taglang; Carl Ekholm; Anders Jönsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Total hip replacement as primary treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Amarjit Singh Sidhu; Ajay Pal Singh; Arun Pal Singh; Sukhraj Singh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.