Literature DB >> 12711743

Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Suzanne W Fletcher1, Joann G Elmore.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 12711743      PMCID： PMC3157308          DOI： 10.1056/NEJMcp021804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN： 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


× No keyword cloud information.
  47 in total

Review 1.  Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures.

Authors:  Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn; Al Mulley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

2.  Pain experienced by women attending breast cancer screening.

Authors:  M E Keemers-Gels; R P Groenendijk; J H van den Heuvel; C Boetes; P G Peer; T H Wobbes
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Case-control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography.

Authors:  L Ma; E Fishell; B Wright; W Hanna; S Allan; N F Boyd
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-05-20       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Benefits and risks of screening mammography for women in their forties: a statistical appraisal.

Authors:  D A Berry
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-10-07       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility, Adopted on February 20, 1996.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Short-term cessation of hormone replacement therapy and improvement of mammographic specificity.

Authors:  J A Harvey; J V Pinkerton; C R Herman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-11-05       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based surveillance, epidemiology and end results program.

Authors:  V L Ernster; J Barclay; K Kerlikowske; H Wilkie; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-04-10

8.  Lumpectomy compared with lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; J Costantino; C Redmond; E Fisher; R Margolese; N Dimitrov; N Wolmark; D L Wickerham; M Deutsch; L Ore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Mammographically occult breast cancer. A pathologic and radiologic study.

Authors:  R Holland; J H Hendriks; M Mravunac
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; W Black; R Harris; B K Rimer; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506
View more
  80 in total

1.  Association between persistence with mammography screening and stage at diagnosis among elderly women diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.

Authors:  Christina M Shafer; Ehsan Samei; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  The use of life expectancy in cancer screening guidelines. Moving with caution from model-based evidence to evidence-based guidelines.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women.

Authors:  Electra Paskett; Cathy Tatum; Julia Rushing; Robert Michielutte; Ronny Bell; Kristie Long Foley; Marisa Bittoni; Stephanie L Dickinson; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Katherine Reeves
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Declining mammography screening in a state Medicaid Fee-for-Service program: 1999-2008.

Authors:  Abhijeet Bhanegaonkar; S Suresh Madhavan; Rahul Khanna; Scot C Remick
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 6.  State of the art of current modalities for the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Cosimo Di Maggio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Preventive health care among older women: missed opportunities and poor targeting.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Suzanne G Leveille; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 8.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Dedicated breast computed tomography: volume image denoising via a partial-diffusion equation based technique.

Authors:  Jessie Q Xia; Joseph Y Lo; Kai Yang; Carey E Floyd; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Method of detection of breast cancer in low-income women.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Allison Diamant; Lalima Hoq; Rose Maly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.