Literature DB >> 19951215

Method of detection of breast cancer in low-income women.

Amardeep Thind1, Allison Diamant, Lalima Hoq, Rose Maly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women, and its timely diagnosis and treatment are of paramount importance, especially for vulnerable groups, such as low-income and uninsured women. Recent literature confirms that the method of breast cancer detection may be an important prognostic factor, but there are no studies that examine the method of breast cancer detection in low-income populations. We sought to analyze the determinants of method of detection (medical vs. self) in a cohort of low-income women with breast cancer receiving care through California's Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program.
METHODS: This is a cross-sectional survey analysis of 921 low-income women interviewed within 6 months of definitive surgical treatment. The outcome analyzed was self vs. medical detection of breast cancer.
RESULTS: The mean age of the women was 53 years, with nearly 88% reporting an income of <$30,000 per year; 64% of women self-detected their breast cancer. Logistic regression analyses revealed that older women, Latinas, and women having any health insurance before diagnosis had lower odds of self-detecting their lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient age, ethnicity, and regular source of care were associated with method of breast cancer detection in a low-income underserved population. The rate of self-detection in our population correlates with the literature, but we need to improve efforts to increase mammography screening to ensure early detection of disease in this vulnerable group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19951215      PMCID: PMC3355470          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  34 in total

1.  Continuity of care and the use of breast and cervical cancer screening services in a multiethnic community.

Authors:  A S O'Malley; J Mandelblatt; K Gold; K A Cagney; J Kerner
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-07-14

2.  Primary care and receipt of preventive services.

Authors:  A B Bindman; K Grumbach; D Osmond; K Vranizan; A L Stewart
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Factors associated with women's adherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Authors:  K A Phillips; K Kerlikowske; L C Baker; S W Chang; M L Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The risk factors of age and family history and their relationship to screening mammography utilization.

Authors:  M E Costanza; A Stoddard; V P Gaw; J G Zapka
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Presenting a diagnosis of cancer: patients' views.

Authors:  J R Peteet; H E Abrams; D M Ross; N M Stearns
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Factors associated with the use of screening mammography in a primary care setting.

Authors:  R E Schoen; M Marcus; R L Braham
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1994-08

7.  Changes in mammography use: economic, need, and service factors.

Authors:  J G Zapka; D Hosmer; M E Costanza; D R Harris; A Stoddard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Factors determining compliance with screening mammography.

Authors:  M D Beaulieu; F Béland; D Roy; M Falardeau; G Hébert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Initial and repeat mammography screening in a low income multi-ethnic population in Los Angeles.

Authors:  R Bastani; C P Kaplan; A E Maxwell; R Nisenbaum; J Pearce; A C Marcus
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Determinants of breast cancer detection among Wisconsin (United States) women, 1988-90.

Authors:  M J Reeves; P A Newcomb; P L Remington; P M Marcus
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.506

View more
  8 in total

1.  Quality of care for breast cancer for uninsured women in california under the breast and cervical cancer prevention treatment act.

Authors:  Jennifer L Malin; Allison L Diamant; Barbara Leake; Yihang Liu; Amardeep Thind; Katherine L Kahn; Eric C Schneider; Arnold M Epstein; Rose C Maly
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Self-detection remains a key method of breast cancer detection for U.S. women.

Authors:  Mara Y Roth; Joann G Elmore; Joyce P Yi-Frazier; Lisa M Reisch; Natalia V Oster; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  What influences diagnostic delay in low-income women with breast cancer?

Authors:  Rose C Maly; Barbara Leake; Cynthia M Mojica; Yihang Liu; Allison L Diamant; Amardeep Thind
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Associations between sociodemographic and clinicopathological factors and breast cancer subtypes in a population-based study.

Authors:  Adana A M Llanos; Sheenu Chandwani; Elisa V Bandera; Kim M Hirshfield; Yong Lin; Christine B Ambrosone; Kitaw Demissie
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Breast and cervical cancer screening patterns among American Indian women at IHS clinics in Montana and Wyoming.

Authors:  Robin Taylor Wilson; Jennifer Giroux; Kathryn Rita Kasicky; Bethany Hemlock Fatupaito; Eric C Wood; Renee Crichlow; Neil A Sun Rhodes; Jennifer Tingueley; Andrea Walling; Kathryn Langwell; Nathaniel Cobb
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Symptomatic Breast Cancer Awareness despite a Recent Screen: The Role of Tumor Biology and Mammography Facility Characteristics.

Authors:  Mylove Mortel; Garth H Rauscher; Anne Marie Murphy; Kent Hoskins; Richard B Warnecke
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Diagnosis and surgical delays in African American and white women with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Prethibha George; Sheenu Chandwani; Molly Gabel; Christine B Ambrosone; George Rhoads; Elisa V Bandera; Kitaw Demissie
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  The Efficacy of Clinical Breast Exams and Breast Self-Exams in Detecting Malignancy or Positive Ultrasound Findings.

Authors:  Nicole Huang; Lu Chen; Jing He; Quan D Nguyen
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.