Literature DB >> 1573665

Case-control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography.

L Ma1, E Fishell, B Wright, W Hanna, S Allan, N F Boyd.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although mammography is widely used to detect breast cancer, it is recognized that not all cancers can be seen on mammographic images.
PURPOSE: Our purpose was to examine factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography.
METHODS: A case-control study was carried out in which subjects in whom histologically verified breast cancer was not detected by mammography (false negatives) were contrasted with subjects in whom breast cancer had been detected by mammography (true positives). Mammograms from individuals with histologically confirmed breast cancer were classified independently by two radiologists who were unaware of the clinical or other characteristics of the subjects. Histologic slides of all tumors were reviewed by one pathologist.
RESULTS: Three variables were found to be independently and significantly associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. Breast cancer was less likely to be detected by mammography in the presence of extensive parenchymal densities (odds ratio [OR] = 9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8-44.3), a tumor of lobular histology (OR = 7; 95% CI = 2.2-22.1), and tumors of small size (OR = 0.10; 95% CI = 0.0-0.9).
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that biologic factors are associated with failure to detect some breast cancers by mammography and indicate directions for future research in breast imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1573665     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/84.10.781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  28 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density.

Authors:  Valentina Assi; Jane Warwick; Jack Cuzick; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Awareness of breast density and its impact on breast cancer detection and risk.

Authors:  Deborah J Rhodes; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Sarah M Jenkins; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Breast conservation for mammographically occult carcinoma.

Authors:  M Morrow; R A Schmidt; C Bucci
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Role of equalisation mammography of dense breasts.

Authors:  D B Plewes; J M Sabol; I Soutar; A Chevrier; R Shumak
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  A novel functional infrared imaging system coupled with multiparametric computerised analysis for risk assessment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Tamar Sella; Miri Sklair-Levy; Maya Cohen; Mona Rozin; Myra Shapiro-Feinberg; Tanir M Allweis; Eugene Libson; David Izhaky
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Influence of personal characteristics of individual women on sensitivity and specificity of mammography in the Million Women Study: cohort study.

Authors:  Emily Banks; Gillian Reeves; Valerie Beral; Diana Bull; Barbara Crossley; Moya Simmonds; Elizabeth Hilton; Stephen Bailey; Nigel Barrett; Peter Briers; Ruth English; Alan Jackson; Elizabeth Kutt; Janet Lavelle; Linda Rockall; Matthew G Wallis; Mary Wilson; Julietta Patnick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-28

Review 9.  Tumor protein p53 (TP53) testing and Li-Fraumeni syndrome : current status of clinical applications and future directions.

Authors:  April D Sorrell; Carin R Espenschied; Julie O Culver; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 10.  Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review.

Authors:  Monika Nothacker; Volker Duda; Markus Hahn; Mathias Warm; Friedrich Degenhardt; Helmut Madjar; Susanne Weinbrenner; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.