Literature DB >> 10930111

Pain experienced by women attending breast cancer screening.

M E Keemers-Gels1, R P Groenendijk, J H van den Heuvel, C Boetes, P G Peer, T H Wobbes.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pain experience of women during mammography for breast cancer screening. Possible associations with personal and medical history, sociodemographics and/or situational factors were studied. It was also investigated whether this pain influenced the intention to return for future breast cancer screening. In the Netherlands, women between 50-75 years are invited for screening every two years. A total of 1200 participants were asked to fill up a questionnaire. The response rate was 79.5% (n = 954), and 945 questionnaires contained adequate information for analyses. A total of 689 women (72.9%) described mammography as mild to severely painful. In this group, compared to the group that reported no pain, the following factors occurred significantly more often: sensitive breasts (P = 0.001), family history of breast diseases (P = 0.017); expected pain based on former mammography (P = 0.001), high education (P = 0.008), anxiety (P = 0.001), breast sensitivity in last three days (P = 0.001), insufficient attention of technologist (P = 0.001). Other factors like age, hormonal status, breast size and hormone use were not associated with the pain experienced. Thirty-two women (3.3%) indicated that they would not attend further screening, 25 (2.6%) reported that the pain might deter them, six women (0.6%) had other reasons, one woman (0.1%) was sure not to come because of severe pain. In conclusion, a large majority of women attending breast cancer screening describes mammography as painful (72.9%). Factors associated with pain were described. Relatively few women (2.7%) indicated that the pain might deter them from future mammography. Recommendations are given to reduce the pain experienced during screening mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10930111     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006457520996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  14 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Ethnic differences in decisional balance and stages of mammography adoption.

Authors:  Regina Otero-Sabogal; Susan Stewart; Sarah J Shema; Rena J Pasick
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2006-08-04

3.  Effects of Reduced Compression in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Pain, Anxiety, and Image Quality.

Authors:  Siti Aishah Abdullah Suhaimi; Afifah Mohamed; Mahadir Ahmad; Kanaga Kumari Chelliah
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2015-11

4.  Pain and discomfort associated with mammography among urban low-income African-American women.

Authors:  Mia A Papas; Ann C Klassen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2005-08

5.  Mammography in females with an implanted medical device: impact on image quality, pain and anxiety.

Authors:  Ellen Paap; Marloes Witjes; Cary van Landsveld-Verhoeven; Ruud M Pijnappel; Angela H E M Maas; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Prospective study of factors predicting adherence to surveillance mammography in women treated for breast cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Shelby; Cindy D Scipio; Tamara J Somers; Mary Scott Soo; Kevin P Weinfurt; Francis J Keefe
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Influence of the radiographer on the pain felt during mammography.

Authors:  M Van Goethem; D Mortelmans; E Bruyninckx; I Verslegers; I Biltjes; E Van Hove; A De Schepper
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Breast cancer screening adherence rates and barriers of implementation in ethnic, cultural and religious minorities: A systematic review.

Authors:  Cristiana Sofia Ferreira; Joana Rodrigues; Stefanie Moreira; Filipa Ribeiro; Adhemar Longatto-Filho
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-05-19

9.  Tolerability of breast ductal lavage in women from families at high genetic risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer T Loud; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Kathryn Nichols; June Peters; Ruthann Giusti; Mark H Greene
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  A New Technical Mode in Mammography: Self-Compression Improves Satisfaction.

Authors:  Sıla Ulus; Özge Kovan; Aydan Arslan; Pınar Elpen; Erkin Arıbal
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.