Literature DB >> 10761960

Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based surveillance, epidemiology and end results program.

V L Ernster1, J Barclay, K Kerlikowske, H Wilkie, R Ballard-Barbash.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over 14% of breast cancers diagnosed in the United States annually are ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS). There are no published population-based reports of the likelihood of breast cancer death among US women with DCIS.
METHODS: We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program to determine the likelihood of breast cancer death at 5 and 10 years among US women aged 40 and older diagnosed with DCIS from 1978 to 1983 (before screening mammography was common; n = 1525) and from 1984 to 1989 (when screening mammography became common; n = 5547). We also calculated standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) to compare observed deaths from breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, and all causes combined among women with DCIS with deaths expected based on general population mortality rates.
RESULTS: Among women diagnosed with DCIS from 1978 to 1983, 1.5% died of breast cancer within 5 years and 3.4% within 10 years. Among women diagnosed from 1984 to 1989, 0.7% died of breast cancer within 5 years and 1.9% within 10 years. Relative to the general population, risk of breast cancer death was greater for women diagnosed from 1978 to 1983 (SMR, 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-4.5) than for women diagnosed from 1984 to 1989 (10-year SMR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5-2.3). Women diagnosed from 1984 to 1989 were significantly less likely than women in the general population to have died of cardiovascular diseases (10-year SMR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.7) or of all causes combined (SMR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7-0.8).
CONCLUSIONS: Among women diagnosed with DCIS, risk of death from breast cancer was low, at least within the 10 years following diagnosis. This may reflect the effectiveness of treatment for DCIS, the "benign" nature of DCIS, or both. At 10 years, women diagnosed from 1984 to 1989 were less likely than women diagnosed from 1978 to 1983 to have died of breast cancer, and their risk of dying of all causes combined was lower than that in the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10761960     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.7.953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  82 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The Effect of Budgetary Restrictions on Breast Cancer Diagnostic Decisions.

Authors:  Mehmet U S Ayvaci; Oguzhan Alagoz; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Manuf Serv Oper Manag       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.600

3.  Progression of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ from the Pathological Perspective.

Authors:  Pedro Oscar R Cunha; Mark Ornstein; J Louise Jones
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Thorsten Kühn
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Racial disparities in risk of second breast tumors after ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Graham A Colditz; Sarah Gehlert; Melody Goodman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; Karla Kerlikowske; Andrew Loh; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  A Prospective Study of Weight Gain in Women Diagnosed with Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer, Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, and Women Without Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Christine C Ekenga; Xiaoyan Wang; Maria Pérez; Mario Schootman; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 8.  Will screening mammography in the East do more harm than good?

Authors:  Gabriel M Leung; Tai-Hing Lam; Thuan Q Thach; Anthony J Hedley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Scintimammography as an adjunctive breast imaging technology: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2007-04-01

10.  Pathologic and biologic response to preoperative endocrine therapy in patients with ER-positive ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Yunn-Yi Chen; Sandy DeVries; Joseph Anderson; Juan Lessing; Rebecca Swain; Koei Chin; Veronica Shim; Laura J Esserman; Frederic M Waldman; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.