Literature DB >> 22568434

Declining mammography screening in a state Medicaid Fee-for-Service program: 1999-2008.

Abhijeet Bhanegaonkar1, S Suresh Madhavan, Rahul Khanna, Scot C Remick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare annual and biennial mammography screening rates across age, race, and geographic location (rural-urban) and to determine mammography screening persistence over 10 years among women enrolled in the West Virginia (WV) Medicaid Fee-for-Service (FFS) program.
METHODS: The WV Medicaid FFS administrative claims data for women recipients aged 40-64 from 1999 to 2008 were used for study purposes. Annual and biennial screening rates and persistence with screening were determined for women who were continuously enrolled in the WV Medicaid FFS program for respective calendar years.
RESULTS: A steady decline in the annual and biennial screening rates over a 10-year period (1999-2008) was observed among women recipients aged 40-64 years in the WV Medicaid FFS program, and screening persistence was also lower. Both annual and biennial screening rates and persistence varied by different demographic characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: Although mammography screening services are covered under Medicaid programs, underuse persists as a major concern. The results of this study emphasize the need to identify and address barriers to mammography screening in low-income rural populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22568434      PMCID: PMC3411332          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2011.2748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  55 in total

1.  Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  N Breen; D K Wagener; M L Brown; W W Davis; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-11-21       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Disparities in health care by race, ethnicity, and language among the insured: findings from a national sample.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Peter Franks; Mark P Doescher; Barry G Saver
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Recent trends in U.S. mammography use from 2000-2006: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  A Blythe Ryerson; Jacqueline W Miller; Christie R Eheman; Steven Leadbetter; Mary C White
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 4.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Otis W Brawley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Assessing and increasing breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Paul L Reiter
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Breast cancer screening, incidence, and mortality in West Virginia.

Authors:  Rahul Khanna; Abhijeet Bhanegaonkar; Pat Colsher; S Suresh Madhavan; Joel Halverson
Journal:  W V Med J       Date:  2009-10

7.  Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality.

Authors:  L Tabár; B Vitak; H H Chen; M F Yen; S W Duffy; R A Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Factors associated with mammography utilization: a systematic quantitative review of the literature.

Authors:  Kristin M Schueler; Philip W Chu; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40-64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Ralph J Coates; Robert J Uhler; Nancy Breen; Florence Tangka; Kate M Shaw
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Mammography facilities are accessible, so why is utilization so low?

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey May Kuo; Laurel J Clayton; W Douglas Evans
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.506

View more
  5 in total

1.  Predictors of self-reported adherence to mammography screening guidelines in West Virginia women visiting a stationary facility.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Kimberly Kelly; Aaron Metzger; Judith Schreiman; Scott Remick
Journal:  W V Med J       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

2.  Evaluating and Comparing Methods for Measuring Spatial Access to Mammography Centers in Appalachia (Re-Revised).

Authors:  Joseph Donohoe; Vincent Marshall; Xi Tan; Fabian T Camacho; Roger Anderson; Rajesh Balkrishnan
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2016-01-12

3.  Do Appalachian women attending a mobile mammography program differ from those visiting a stationary mammography facility?

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Kimberly Kelly; Aaron Metzger; Judith Schreiman; Scot Remick
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-08

4.  Breast Cancer Screening Among Women with Medicaid, 2006-2008: a Multilevel Analysis.

Authors:  Lee Rivers Mobley; Sujha Subramanian; Florence K Tangka; Sonja Hoover; Jiantong Wang; Ingrid J Hall; Simple D Singh
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-06-10

5.  Insure Me Cancer Free: An Intervention Utilizing a Dynamic Communication Model.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Brandon Dolly; Stephenie Kennedy; Elvonna Atkins; Michelle Coon; Kemi King; Yves Mbous; Shelly Rouse
Journal:  Health Behav Res       Date:  2019-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.