Literature DB >> 6313174

Mammographically occult breast cancer. A pathologic and radiologic study.

R Holland, J H Hendriks, M Mravunac.   

Abstract

Fifteen mammographically occult breast cancers, 3 of which were preinvasive and 12 invasive, and 52 breast cancers, which presented only microcalcifications mammographically without an associated tumor shadow (33 preinvasive and 19 invasive), were reviewed pathologically and radiologically. This study suggests that most of the preinvasive cancers, without mammographically significant calcifications, are, and some of the invasive cancers situated in dense breasts may be, mammographically occult. The mean diameter of the five mammographically occult invasive ductal carcinomas and the five invasive lobular carcinomas was 20 mm and 50 mm, respectively. Histologic characteristics, which may explain why invasive lobular carcinomas could be occult mammographically, even in an advanced stage, include a diffuse invasive pattern and, frequently, a poor desmoplastic reaction in contrast to the invasive ductal carcinomas. The implications of mammographically occult cancers on management of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6313174     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19831115)52:10<1810::aid-cncr2820521009>3.0.co;2-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  23 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  MRI patterns of invasive lobular cancer: T1 and T2 features.

Authors:  G Levrini; C A Mori; R Vacondio; G Borasi; F Nicoli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  The use of ultrasonography and digital mammography in women under 40 years with symptomatic breast cancer: a 7-year Irish experience.

Authors:  C E Redmond; G M Healy; C F Murphy; A O'Doherty; A Foster
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  The role of mammography in the detection of bilateral primary breast cancer.

Authors:  J G Tinnemans; T Wobbes; J H Hendriks; R Holland; R F Van der Sluis; H H De Boer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Stereotaxic needle localization and cytological diagnosis of occult breast lesions.

Authors:  H J Gent; E Sprenger; K Dowlatshahi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  In situ breast carcinomas: a population-based study on frequency, growth pattern, and clinical aspects.

Authors:  M Blichert-Toft; H P Graversen; J Andersen; U Dyreborg; A Green
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Breast scintigraphy today: indications and limitations.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; John R Buscombe
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Authors:  C H van Gils; J D Otten; A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Tumor biology of infiltrating lobular carcinoma. Implications for management.

Authors:  T J Yeatman; A B Cantor; T J Smith; S K Smith; D S Reintgen; M S Miller; N N Ku; P A Baekey; C E Cox
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Influence of additional breast ultrasound on cancer detection in a cohort study for quality assurance in breast diagnosis--analysis of 102,577 diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  Fritz K W Schaefer; A Waldmann; A Katalinic; C Wefelnberg; M Heller; W Jonat; I Schreer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.