Literature DB >> 12495511

Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention.

Reuven Dukas1.   

Abstract

Ecological research in the past few decades has shown that most animals acquire and respond adaptively to information that affects survival and reproduction. At the same time, neurobiological studies have established that the rate of information processing by the brain is much lower than the rate at which information is encountered in the environment, and that attentional mechanisms enable the brain to focus only on the most essential information at any given time. Recent integration of the ecological and neurobiological approaches helps us to understand key behaviours with broad ecological and evolutionary implications. Specifically, current data indicate that limited attention affects diet choice and constrains animals' ability simultaneously to feed and attend to predators. Recent experiments also suggest that limited attention influences social interactions, courtship and mating behaviour.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12495511      PMCID: PMC1693070          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  25 in total

1.  Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention.

Authors:  P Fries; J H Reynolds; A E Rorie; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly.

Authors:  M D Rausher
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-06-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Selective attention and search images in pigeons.

Authors:  P M Blough
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1991-07

4.  Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities.

Authors:  J Duncan; S Martens; R Ward
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Topographic maps are fundamental to sensory processing.

Authors:  J H Kaas
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Attention to one or two features in left or right visual field: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  R Vandenberghe; J Duncan; P Dupont; R Ward; J B Poline; G Bormans; J Michiels; L Mortelmans; G A Orban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Information processing in the nervous system.

Authors:  D E Broadbent
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Frequency-dependent selection by predators.

Authors:  J A Allen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1988-07-06       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention.

Authors:  T A Mondor; R J Zatorre
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Search Image Formation in the Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata).

Authors:  A T Pietrewicz; A C Kamil
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  46 in total

1.  Motion perception and visual signal design in Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Leo J Fleishman; Adam C Pallus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Flowers help bees cope with uncertainty: signal detection and the function of floral complexity.

Authors:  Anne S Leonard; Anna Dornhaus; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Information from familiar and related conspecifics affects foraging in a solitary wolf spider.

Authors:  Catherine R Hoffman; Michael I Sitvarin; Ann L Rypstra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Discrete neurochemical coding of distinguishable motivational processes: insights from nucleus accumbens control of feeding.

Authors:  Brian A Baldo; Ann E Kelley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Through their eyes: selective attention in peahens during courtship.

Authors:  Jessica L Yorzinski; Gail L Patricelli; Jason S Babcock; John M Pearson; Michael L Platt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Modeling and measuring the visual detection of ecologically relevant motion by an Anolis lizard.

Authors:  Adam C Pallus; Leo J Fleishman; Philip M Castonguay
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Brief predator sound exposure elicits behavioral and neuronal long-term sensitization in the olfactory system of an insect.

Authors:  Sylvia Anton; Katarina Evengaard; Romina B Barrozo; Peter Anderson; Niels Skals
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  When do I quit? The search termination problem in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

9.  Pairing context determines condition-dependence of song rate in a monogamous passerine bird.

Authors:  Morgan David; Yannick Auclair; Sasha R X Dall; Frank Cézilly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Matthew S Cain; Avigael M Aizenman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.