Literature DB >> 2905488

Frequency-dependent selection by predators.

J A Allen1.   

Abstract

Sometimes predators tend to concentrate on common varieties of prey and overlook rare ones. Within prey species, this could result in the fitness of each variety being inversely related to its frequency in the population. Such frequency-dependent or 'apostatic' selection by predators hunting by sight could maintain polymorphism for colour pattern, and much of the supporting evidence for this idea has come from work on birds and artificial prey. These and other studies have shown that the strength of the observed selection is affected by prey density, palatability, coloration and conspicuousness. When the prey density is very high, selection becomes 'anti-apostatic': predators preferentially remove rare prey. There is still much to be learned about frequency-dependent selection by predators on artificial prey: work on natural polymorphic prey has hardly begun.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2905488     DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1988.0061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  21 in total

1.  Negative frequency-dependent selection maintains a dramatic flower color polymorphism in the rewardless orchid Dactylorhiza sambucina (L.) Soo.

Authors:  L D Gigord; M R Macnair; A Smithson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  A general multi-trait-based framework for studying the effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning.

Authors:  Van M Savage; Colleen T Webb; Jon Norberg
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Frequency-dependent selection and the maintenance of genetic variation: exploring the parameter space of the multiallelic pairwise interaction model.

Authors:  Meredith V Trotter; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Maximization principles for frequency-dependent selection II: the one-locus multiallele case.

Authors:  Kristan Alexander Schneider
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Genetic versus phenotypic models of selection: can genetics be neglected in a long-term perspective?

Authors:  F J Weissing
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 7.  Signal function drives phenotypic and genetic diversity: the effects of signalling individual identity, quality or behavioural strategy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Tibbetts; Sean P Mullen; James Dale
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Frequency-dependent host selection by parasitic mites: a model and a case study.

Authors:  S Izraylevich; O Hasson; U Gerson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Reversible frequency-dependent switches in male mate choice.

Authors:  H van Gossum; R Stoks; L De Bruyn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Frequency-dependent selection by wild birds promotes polymorphism in model salamanders.

Authors:  Benjamin M Fitzpatrick; Kim Shook; Reuben Izally
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 2.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.