Literature DB >> 23437634

When do I quit? The search termination problem in visual search.

Jeremy M Wolfe1.   

Abstract

In visual search tasks, observers look for targets in displays or scenes containing distracting, non-target items. Most of the research on this topic has concerned the finding of those targets. Search termination is a less thoroughly studied topic. When is it time to abandon the current search? The answer is fairly straight forward when the one and only target has been found (There are my keys.). The problem is more vexed if nothing has been found (When is it time to stop looking for a weapon at the airport checkpoint?) or when the number of targets is unknown (Have we found all the tumors?). This chapter reviews the development of ideas about quitting time in visual search and offers an outline of our current theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23437634      PMCID: PMC3979292          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4794-8_8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv        ISSN: 0146-7875


  81 in total

1.  Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Causes and consequences of limited attention.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 3.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-05-26

4.  Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Abrupt luminance change pops out; abrupt color change does not.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-07

6.  Spatial and temporal separation fails to counteract the effects of low prevalence in visual search.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Anina N Rich; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2010-06-01

7.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry.

Authors:  C Koch; S Ullman
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985

8.  Disease prevalence and radiological decision making.

Authors:  H L Kundel
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Influence of signal probability during pretraining on vigilance decrement.

Authors:  W P Colquhoun; A D Baddeley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-01

10.  Varying target prevalence reveals two dissociable decision criteria in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Michael J Van Wert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  10 in total

1.  LIP activity in the interstimulus interval of a change detection task biases the behavioral response.

Authors:  Fabrice Arcizet; Koorosh Mirpour; Daniel J Foster; Caroline J Charpentier; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Does Expectation of Abnormality Affect the Search Pattern of Radiologists When Looking for Pulmonary Nodules?

Authors:  Stephen Littlefair; Patrick Brennan; Warren Reed; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Major issues in the study of visual search: Part 2 of "40 Years of Feature Integration: Special Issue in Memory of Anne Treisman".

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  When is it time to move to the next map? Optimal foraging in guided visual search.

Authors:  Krista A Ehinger; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Effects of age and cardiovascular disease on selective attention.

Authors:  Sylvie Chokron; Gérard Helft; Céline Perez
Journal:  Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol       Date:  2013-12-25

6.  Inter-trial effects in visual pop-out search: Factorial comparison of Bayesian updating models.

Authors:  Fredrik Allenmark; Hermann J Müller; Zhuanghua Shi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Visual search errors are persistent in a laboratory analog of the incidental finding problem.

Authors:  Makaela S Nartker; Abla Alaoui-Soce; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-07-29

8.  How did I miss that? Developing mixed hybrid visual search as a 'model system' for incidental finding errors in radiology.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Abla Alaoui Soce; Hayden M Schill
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-08-23

9.  Deep learning can be used to train naïve, nonprofessional observers to detect diagnostic visual patterns of certain cancers in mammograms: a proof-of-principle study.

Authors:  Jay Hegdé
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-02-04

10.  Finding counterfeited banknotes: the roles of vision and touch.

Authors:  Frank van der Horst; Joshua Snell; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-08-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.