Literature DB >> 9133394

Attention to one or two features in left or right visual field: a positron emission tomography study.

R Vandenberghe1, J Duncan, P Dupont, R Ward, J B Poline, G Bormans, J Michiels, L Mortelmans, G A Orban.   

Abstract

In human vision, two features of the same object can be identified concurrently without loss of accuracy. Performance declines, however, when the features belong to different objects in opposite visual fields. We hypothesized that different positron emission tomography activation patterns would reflect these behavioral results. We first delineated an attention network for single discriminations in left or right visual field and then compared this with the activation pattern when subjects divided attention over two features of a single object or over two objects in opposite hemifields. When subjects attended to a single feature, parietal, premotor, and anterior cingulate cortex were activated. These effects were strongest in the right hemisphere and were, remarkably, unaffected by the direction of attention. In contrast, direction of attention affected occipital and frontal activity: right occipital and left lateral frontal activity were higher with attention to the left, whereas right lateral frontal activity was higher with attention to the right. When subjects identified two features of the same object, parietal, premotor, and anterior cingulate activity was enhanced further, predominantly this time in the left hemisphere. Again, there was no direction sensitivity. Direction-sensitive activation of lateral frontal cortex also was increased. Finally, when subjects divided their attention over opposite hemifields, activity in the direction-sensitive occipital and frontal regions fell to a level midway between those seen during exclusively leftward or rightward attention. Thus, the behavioral efficiency with which we attend to multiple features of a single peripheral object is paralleled by enhanced activity in structures generally active during peripheral selective attention as well as in structures that depend on the specific direction of attention, most notably lateral frontal cortex. In addition, in the direction-sensitive regions, dividing attention over hemifields causes a compromise pattern between the extreme levels obtained during unilateral attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9133394      PMCID: PMC6573671     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  29 in total

1.  Reproducibility of PET activation studies: lessons from a multi-center European experiment. EU concerted action on functional imaging.

Authors:  J B Poline; R Vandenberghe; A P Holmes; K J Friston; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Ibotenic acid lesions of the lateral substantia nigra restore visual orientation behavior in the hemianopic cat.

Authors:  S F Wallace; A C Rosenquist; J M Sprague
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1990-06-08       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Frontal lobe neglect in man.

Authors:  K M Heilman; E Valenstein
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  A PET study of visuospatial attention.

Authors:  M Corbetta; F M Miezin; G L Shulman; S E Petersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Cortical control of saccades and fixation in man. A PET study.

Authors:  T J Anderson; I H Jenkins; D J Brooks; M B Hawken; R S Frackowiak; C Kennard
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Frontal lobe lesions in man cause difficulties in suppressing reflexive glances and in generating goal-directed saccades.

Authors:  D Guitton; H A Buchtel; R M Douglas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Coordination of what and where in visual attention.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Brain systems for encoding and retrieval of auditory-verbal memory. An in vivo study in humans.

Authors:  P C Fletcher; C D Frith; P M Grasby; T Shallice; R S Frackowiak; R J Dolan
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Changes in sensory inattention, directional motor neglect and "release" of the fixation reflex following a unilateral frontal lesion: a case report.

Authors:  C M Butter; S Rapcsak; R T Watson; K M Heilman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  22 in total

1.  A neurodynamical model of visual attention: feedback enhancement of spatial resolution in a hierarchical system.

Authors:  G Deco; J Zihl
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Human prefrontal and sensory cortical activity during divided attention tasks.

Authors:  Rainer Loose; Christian Kaufmann; Dorothee P Auer; Klaus W Lange
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Space-, object-, and feature-based attention interact to organize visual scenes.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Spatial attention: more than intrinsic alerting?

Authors:  W Sturm; B Schmenk; B Fimm; K Specht; S Weis; A Thron; K Willmes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Temporal kinetics of prefrontal modulation of the extrastriate cortex during visual attention.

Authors:  Elena Yago; Audrey Duarte; Ting Wong; Francisco Barceló; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 7.  Ascending and descending mechanisms of visual lateralization in pigeons.

Authors:  Carlos-Eduardo Valencia-Alfonso; Josine Verhaal; Onur Güntürkün
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Microstimulation of monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex impairs antisaccade performance.

Authors:  Stephen P Wegener; Kevin Johnston; Stefan Everling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Executive control of spatial attention shifts in the auditory compared to the visual modality.

Authors:  Katrin Krumbholz; Esther A Nobis; Robert J Weatheritt; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Mechanisms of spatial attention control in frontal and parietal cortex.

Authors:  Sara M Szczepanski; Christina S Konen; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.