Literature DB >> 7714479

Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention.

T A Mondor1, R J Zatorre.   

Abstract

Auditory spatial attention was investigated by manipulating spatial and temporal relations between an auditory spatial cue and an auditory target. The principal findings were that performance improved as time available to shift attention to a cued spatial position increased, accurate spatial cues facilitated performance more than inaccurate cues, performance was virtually identical for shifts of attention ranging from 0 degrees and 180 degrees, and performance declined as the distance of an unexpected target from a cued spatial location increased. The experiments provided evidence that auditory attention may be allocated to a specific location in response to an auditory spatial cue and that the time required to shift attention does not appear to depend on the distance of the shift. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the spatial distribution of auditory attention may be described most accurately by a gradient model in which attentional resources decline gradually with distance from a focal point.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7714479     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.2.387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  31 in total

1.  Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Jamie Chevalier; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory sequence learning: differential sensitivity to task relevant and task irrelevant sequences.

Authors:  B Riedel; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-06-30

5.  Attending points in time and space.

Authors:  Kathrin Lange; Ulrike M Krämer; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visually-guided attention enhances target identification in a complex auditory scene.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol J Ozmeral; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-14

7.  Neuronal modulation of auditory attention by informative and uninformative spatial cues.

Authors:  Andrew R Mayer; Alexandre R Franco; Deborah L Harrington
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol J Ozmeral; Norbert Kopco; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Influence of preparation time and pitch separation in switching of auditory attention between streams.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Control mechanisms mediating shifts of attention in auditory and visual space: a spatio-temporal ERP analysis.

Authors:  Jessica J Green; Wolfgang A Teder-Sälejärvi; John J McDonald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.