Literature DB >> 26497123

Information from familiar and related conspecifics affects foraging in a solitary wolf spider.

Catherine R Hoffman1, Michael I Sitvarin1,2, Ann L Rypstra3.   

Abstract

As neighbours become familiar with one another, they can divert attention away from one another and focus on other activities. Since familiarity is a likely mechanism by which animals recognise relatives, both kinship and prior association with conspecifics should allow individuals to increase foraging. We attempted to determine if the interference observed among conspecific foragers could be mitigated by familiarity and/or kinship. Because Pardosa milvina wolf spiders are sensitive to chemotactile cues deposited on substrates by other spiders, we used cues to manipulate the information available to focal spiders. We first verified that animals could use these cues to differentiate relatives and familiar conspecifics. We then documented foraging in the presence of all combinations of related and familiar animal cues. Test spiders were slower foragers, less likely to capture prey, and consumed less of each prey item when on cues from unfamiliar kin, but were faster and more effective foragers on cues from familiar non-kin. Their reactions to familiar kin and unfamiliar non-kin were intermediate. High foraging intensity on familiar cues is consistent with the idea that animals pay less attention to neighbours after some prior association. Lower foraging effort in the presence of cues from relatives may be an attempt to reduce kin competition by shifting attention toward dispersal or to provide increased access to prey for hungry relatives nearby. These findings reveal that information from conspecifics mediates social interactions among individuals and affects foraging in ways that can influence their role in the food web.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dear enemy; Familiarity; Foraging; Limited attention; Relatedness

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26497123     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3460-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

Review 1.  Cooperation and competition between relatives.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ido Pen; Ashleigh S Griffin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Causes and consequences of limited attention.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 4.  Cannibalism, food limitation, intraspecific competition, and the regulation of spider populations.

Authors:  David H Wise
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 19.686

5.  'Nasty neighbours' rather than 'dear enemies' in a social carnivore.

Authors:  Corsin A Müller; Marta B Manser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  How do foragers decide when to leave a patch? A test of alternative models under natural and experimental conditions.

Authors:  Harry H Marshall; Alecia J Carter; Alexandra Ashford; J Marcus Rowcliffe; Guy Cowlishaw
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 7.  Insights from insects about adaptive social information use.

Authors:  Christoph Grüter; Ellouise Leadbeater
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Opportunistic predator prefers habitat complexity that exposes prey while reducing cannibalism and intraguild encounters.

Authors:  Jason M Schmidt; Ann L Rypstra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Smells familiar: group-joining decisions of predatory mites are mediated by olfactory cues of social familiarity.

Authors:  Muluken G Muleta; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Consequences of variation in foraging success among predators on numerical response.

Authors:  Toshinori Okuyama
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  2 in total

1.  Flock-dependent exploitation of a limited resource in House Sparrow.

Authors:  Elisa Ligorio; Beniamino Tuliozi; Herbert Hoi; Matteo Griggio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Assessing the potential for intraguild predation among taxonomically disparate micro-carnivores: marsupials and arthropods.

Authors:  Tamara I Potter; Aaron C Greenville; Christopher R Dickman
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.963

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.