Literature DB >> 9194561

Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities.

J Duncan1, S Martens, R Ward.   

Abstract

Restrictions to attentional capacity are revealed by the interference that commonly results when two sensory inputs must be identified at the same time. To investigate this phenomenon within and between modalities, we presented streams of visual and/or auditory inputs, containing occasional targets to be identified and recalled. For two visual or two auditory streams, identification of one target produced a sustained reduction in the ability to identify a second, the period of interference lasting for several hundred milliseconds. Subjectively, when attention was assigned to one target it was temporarily unavailable for another. In contrast, there was no such time-locked interference between targets in different modalities. The results suggest a modality-specific restriction to concurrent attention and awareness; visual attention to one simple target does not restrict concurrent auditory attention to another.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9194561     DOI: 10.1038/42947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  86 in total

1.  Visual encoding of patterns is subject to dual-task interference.

Authors:  R Dell'Acqua; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Changes in posture alter the attentional demands of voluntary movement.

Authors:  R G Carson; R Chua; W D Byblow; P Poon; C J Smethurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A crossmodal attentional blink between vision and touch.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence; Katherine Fairbank; Alan Kingstone; Anne P Hillstrom; Kimron Shapiro
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

4.  Cross-modality attentional blinks without preparatory task-set switching.

Authors:  Karen M Arnell; Julie M Larson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

5.  The attentional blink with targets in different spatial locations.

Authors:  T A Visser; S M Zuvic; W F Bischof; V Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

6.  Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

7.  Principles of cross-modal competition: evidence from deficits of attention.

Authors:  Brenda Rapp; Sharma K Hendel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

8.  Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention.

Authors:  Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Unimodal and crossmodal effects of endogenous attention to visual and auditory motion.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  "Change deafness" arising from inter-feature masking within a single auditory object.

Authors:  Nicolas Barascud; Timothy D Griffiths; David McAlpine; Maria Chait
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.