Literature DB >> 12479503

A demonstration of the impact of response bias on the results of patient satisfaction surveys.

Kathleen M Mazor1, Brian E Clauser, Terry Field, Robert A Yood, Jerry H Gurwitz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of the present study were to examine patient satisfaction survey data for evidence of response bias, and to demonstrate, using simulated data, how response bias may impact interpretation of results. DATA SOURCES: Patient satisfaction ratings of primary care providers (family practitioners and general internists) practicing in the context of a group-model health maintenance organization and simulated data generated to be comparable to the actual data. STUDY
DESIGN: Correlational analysis of actual patient satisfaction data, followed by a simulation study where response bias was modeled, with comparison of results from biased and unbiased samples. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: A positive correlation was found between mean patient satisfaction rating and response rate in the actual patient satisfaction data. Simulation results suggest response bias could lead to overestimation of patient satisfaction overall, with this effect greatest for physicians with the lowest satisfaction scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that response bias may significantly impact the results of patient satisfaction surveys, leading to overestimation of the level of satisfaction in the patient population overall. Estimates of satisfaction may be most inflated for providers with the least satisfied patients, thereby threatening the validity of provider-level comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12479503      PMCID: PMC1464019          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.11194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  32 in total

1.  Socioeconomic status and dissatisfaction among HMO enrollees.

Authors:  M J Carlson; J Blustein; N Fiorentino; F Prestianni
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Assessing response bias in random-digit dialling surveys: the telephone-prefix method.

Authors:  P Diehr; T D Koepsell; A Cheadle; B M Psaty
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Non-response bias in a lifestyle survey.

Authors:  A Hill; J Roberts; P Ewings; D Gunnell
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1997-06

4.  The effect of non-response bias on the results of two-stage screening surveys of psychiatric disorder.

Authors:  P Williams; A Macdonald
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry       Date:  1986

5.  Response bias in the Honolulu Heart Program.

Authors:  R Benfante; D Reed; C MacLean; A Kagan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  A national survey of the arrangements managed-care plans make with physicians.

Authors:  M R Gold; R Hurley; T Lake; T Ensor; R Berenson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey.

Authors:  J F Etter; T V Perneger
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 8.  The use of patient perceptions in the evaluation of health-care delivery systems.

Authors:  G E Rosenthal; S E Shannon
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Does sponsorship matter in patient satisfaction surveys? A randomized trial.

Authors:  J F Etter; T V Perneger; A Rougemont
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Resident-patient interactions: the humanistic qualities of internal medicine residents assessed by patients, attending physicians, program supervisors, and nurses.

Authors:  J O Woolliscroft; J D Howell; B P Patel; D B Swanson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.893

View more
  65 in total

1.  Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians.

Authors:  William L Cull; Karen G O'Connor; Sanford Sharp; Suk-fong S Tang
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Using electronic discussion boards to teach responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Access to and continuity of primary medical care of different providers as perceived by the Finnish population.

Authors:  Pekka Mäntyselkä; Pirjo Halonen; Arto Vehviläinen; Jorma Takala; Esko Kumpusalo
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.581

4.  Adherence to tamoxifen in breast cancer patients: What role does the pharmacist play in German primary care?

Authors:  Madlene Schulz; Lena Klopp-Schulze; Stefanie Keilhack; Sandra Meyer; Lea Botermann; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2018-12-20

5.  Evaluating survey quality in health services research: a decision framework for assessing nonresponse bias.

Authors:  Jonathon R B Halbesleben; Marilyn V Whitman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  The Association Between Physician Race/Ethnicity and Patient Satisfaction: an Exploration in Direct to Consumer Telemedicine.

Authors:  Kathryn A Martinez; Kaitlin Keenan; Radhika Rastogi; Joud Roufael; Adrianne Fletcher; Mark N Rood; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Patient perspectives on interpersonal aspects of healthcare and patient-centeredness at primary health facilities: A mixed methods study in rural Eastern Uganda.

Authors:  Everlyn Waweru; Tom Smekens; Joanna Orne-Gliemann; Freddie Ssengooba; Jacqueline Broerse; Bart Criel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Developing a theoretical framework to illustrate associations among patient satisfaction, body image and quality of life for women undergoing breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Summer W Nipomnick; Melissa A Crosby; Gregory P Reece
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.111

9.  Differences in the quality of interpersonal care in complementary and conventional medicine.

Authors:  André Busato; Beat Künzi
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.659

10.  Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Patients' Perceptions of the Patient Portal Experience with OpenNotes.

Authors:  Vimal K Mishra; Robert E Hoyt; Susan E Wolver; Ann Yoshihashi; Colin Banas
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.