Literature DB >> 16279758

Using electronic discussion boards to teach responsible conduct of research.

David B Resnik1.   

Abstract

This study presents the results of a survey of student satisfaction with electronic discussion boards in a course on the responsible conduct of research (RCR). On a 1-5 scale, the respondents stated that the use of the electronic discussion board was an effective teaching tool (4.71), that it enabled them to get feedback from their peers (4.43), that it helped promote discussion and debate (4.36), that it helped them learn how to analyze ethical dilemmas in research (4.36), and that they would consider using an electronic discussion board, if they ever taught a course themselves (4.76). In their written comments, the respondents indicated that electronic discussion boards are a convenient way of promoting debate and in-depth discussion. These results suggest, but do not prove, that discussion boards can promote debate and discussion in courses on research ethics. Instructors who teach RCR should consider using electronic discussion boards in regular or online courses, and they should consider studying the effectiveness of electronic discussion boards in research ethics education. Although electronic discussion boards cannot replace the face-to-face interaction that occurs in a classroom setting, they may provide a useful medium for the exchange of ideas and opinions online.

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16279758     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-005-0029-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  4 in total

1.  Comparing lecture and e-learning as pedagogies for new and experienced professionals in dentistry.

Authors:  L Browne; S Mehra; R Rattan; G Thomas
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2004-07-24       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 2.  Misconceptions and realities about teaching online.

Authors:  Joan E Sieber
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  Educational technologies and the teaching of ethics in science and engineering.

Authors:  Michael C Loui
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  A demonstration of the impact of response bias on the results of patient satisfaction surveys.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Brian E Clauser; Terry Field; Robert A Yood; Jerry H Gurwitz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  The Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT): a discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment.

Authors:  Jason Borenstein; Matthew J Drake; Robert Kirkman; Julie L Swann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.

Authors:  Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach.

Authors:  E Michelle Todd; Logan L Watts; Tyler J Mulhearn; Brett S Torrence; Megan R Turner; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.525

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.