Literature DB >> 9243437

Non-response bias in a lifestyle survey.

A Hill1, J Roberts, P Ewings, D Gunnell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Monitoring health targets is often undertaken using questionnaire surveys of lifestyle risk factors. Non-response bias is recognized but rarely quantified.
METHODS: Following a questionnaire survey on a random sample of 6009 residents of Somerset with a response rate of 57.6 per cent, a telephone survey was undertaken on a random sample of 400 non-responders. A small number of the more important questions from the questionnaire were put to the non-responders over the phone.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine per cent of the sample were contacted and agreed to participate. Statistically significant differences between responders and non-responders to the original questionnaire were detected for current smoking, hazardous alcohol consumption and lack of moderate or vigorous activity.
CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle questionnaire surveys need to include an assessment of the non-response bias.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9243437     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Med        ISSN: 0957-4832


  45 in total

1.  Considerations for the design and analysis of experimental studies in physical activity and exercise promotion: advantages of the randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S S Tai; S Iliffe
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  The effect of different methods of collecting data: mail, telephone and filter data collection issues in utility measurement.

Authors:  Graeme Hawthorne
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Validation of a home safety questionnaire used in a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Watson; D Kendrick; C Coupland
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.399

4.  Estimating non-response bias in family studies: application to mental health and lifestyle.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Vink; Gonneke Willemsen; Janine H Stubbe; Christel M Middeldorp; Rozemarijn S L Ligthart; Kim D Baas; Hanneke J C Dirkzwager; Eco J C de Geus; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Decline in respiratory symptoms in service workers five months after a public smoking ban.

Authors:  T M L Eagan; J Hetland; L E Aarø
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  Rheumatologists' opinions towards complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Grainger; Jennifer Walker
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Health and demographic characteristics of respondents in an Australian national sexuality survey: comparison with population norms.

Authors:  D M Purdie; M P Dunne; F M Boyle; M D Cook; J M Najman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Did Finland's Tobacco Control Act of 1976 have an impact on ever smoking? An examination based on male and female cohort trends.

Authors:  S Helakorpi; T Martelin; J Torppa; K Patja; E Vartiainen; A Uutela
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Income and health behaviours. Evidence from monitoring surveys among Finnish adults.

Authors:  M Laaksonen; R Prättälä; V Helasoja; A Uutela; E Lahelma
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Comparison of participants and non-participants to the ORISCAV-LUX population-based study on cardiovascular risk factors in Luxembourg.

Authors:  Ala'a Alkerwi; Nicolas Sauvageot; Sophie Couffignal; Adelin Albert; Marie-Lise Lair; Michèle Guillaume
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.