Literature DB >> 9366880

The use of patient perceptions in the evaluation of health-care delivery systems.

G E Rosenthal1, S E Shannon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patient perceptions are increasingly used to measure quality of care in a diversity of health-care delivery settings. The goals of this article are to review the current use of patient perceptions and to review what is known about the sensitivity of patient perceptions for discerning variations in care across delivery systems.
METHODS: This article first provides a rationale for using patient perceptions to evaluate delivery systems and reviews proposed frameworks for measuring perceptions. It then reviews illustrative studies that have used patient perceptions to compare delivery systems or that have examined associations between patient perceptions and other health-care indicators.
RESULTS: Although the results of these studies suggest some general relations between patient perceptions and characteristics of delivery systems, findings are often inconsistent across individual studies. These inconsistencies may be related to several potential methodological limitations, including failure to account for the impact of patient mix, ceiling effects of patient responses, nonresponse bias, differences in data collection methods and timing of surveys, use of proxy respondents, and differences in survey instruments.
CONCLUSIONS: The discussion concludes with five conceptual challenges and recommendations for further research: (1) to establish the sensitivity of patient perceptions for discerning differences across delivery systems; (2) to establish relations between alternative frameworks for measuring patient perceptions; (3) to standardize the measurement of patient perceptions; (4) to define optimal ways of presenting patient perceptions data to users; and (5) to broaden the "patient" populations in which perceptions of care have been measured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9366880     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199711001-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  49 in total

1.  Technical Quality of Maternity Care: the Pregnant Women's Perspective.

Authors:  Andrew Wilson; Jafar Sadegh Tabrizi; Kamal Gholipour; Mostafa Farahbakhsh
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2013-06-30

2.  Patients' perceptions of omitted examinations and tests: A qualitative analysis.

Authors:  R L Kravitz; E J Callahan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials.

Authors:  Simon J Griffin; Ann-Louise Kinmonth; Marijcke W M Veltman; Susan Gillard; Julie Grant; Moira Stewart
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Impact of patient obesity on the patient-provider relationship.

Authors:  Kimberly Anne Gudzune; Mary Margaret Huizinga; Lisa Angeline Cooper
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-02-01

5.  Functional status and patient satisfaction: a comparison of ischemic heart disease, obstructive lung disease, and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Vincent S Fan; Gayle E Reiber; Paula Diehr; Marcia Burman; Mary B McDonell; Stephan D Fihn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Informational Support in Pediatric Oncology: Review of the Challenges Among Arab Families.

Authors:  Naïma Otmani; Mohammed Khattab
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Hostile sexist male patients and female doctors: a challenging encounter.

Authors:  Christina Klöckner Cronauer; Marianne Schmid Mast
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Satisfaction with care among low-income women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Lalima Hoq; Allison Diamant; Rose C Maly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Ambulatory health service users' experience of waiting time and expenditure and factors associated with the perception of low quality of care in Mexico.

Authors:  Alma Lucila Sauceda-Valenzuela; Veronika J Wirtz; Yared Santa-Ana-Téllez; Maria de la Luz Kageyama-Escobar
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  The effect of performance-based financial incentives on improving patient care experiences: a statewide evaluation.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Ted von Glahn; Marc N Elliott; William H Rogers; Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.