Literature DB >> 8606557

Does sponsorship matter in patient satisfaction surveys? A randomized trial.

J F Etter1, T V Perneger, A Rougemont.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of sponsorship of a mailed satisfaction survey on response patterns and patient satisfaction ratings, and to establish whether satisfaction ratings depend on the timing of response. The study was part of a patient satisfaction survey conducted in a medical group practice in Geneva, Switzerland. All persons who had received an outpatient visit at the medical practice in the last week of September 1993 were assigned randomly to receiving the survey package either on university letterhead or on the medical practice letterhead. Participation rates were 80.5% and 80.4% in the two groups, respectively. The sponsorship of the survey had no detectable impact on response speed or response completeness. Six out of seven satisfaction scores were higher in the "medical practice" group, but the differences were not statistically significant. As data collection progressed, the cumulative satisfaction rating decreased gradually. This association was statistically significant but moderate. Whether a satisfaction survey is sponsored by a university or a health care provider does not seem to affect survey results. However, low survey response rates may moderately bias satisfaction estimates toward higher values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8606557     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199604000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  6 in total

1.  A demonstration of the impact of response bias on the results of patient satisfaction surveys.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Brian E Clauser; Terry Field; Robert A Yood; Jerry H Gurwitz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): methods and 1996 response rates from 11 states.

Authors:  B C Gilbert; H B Shulman; L A Fischer; M M Rogers
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1999-12

3.  An audit of outcome including patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction performed by breast surgeons.

Authors:  M G Berry; R A al-Mufti; A D Jenkinson; S Denton; M Sullivan; A Vaus; R Carpenter
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Effects of survey mode, patient mix, and nonresponse on CAHPS hospital survey scores.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Elizabeth Goldstein; William Lehrman; Katrin Hambarsoomians; Megan K Beckett; Laura Giordano
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

6.  Client Satisfaction and Experience With Telepsychiatry: Development and Validation of a Survey Using Clinical Quality Domains.

Authors:  Eva Serhal; Anne Kirvan; Marcos Sanches; Allison Crawford
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.