Literature DB >> 23046097

Evaluating survey quality in health services research: a decision framework for assessing nonresponse bias.

Jonathon R B Halbesleben1, Marilyn V Whitman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To address the issue of nonresponse as problematic and offer appropriate strategies for assessing nonresponse bias. STUDY
DESIGN: A review of current strategies used to assess the quality of survey data and the challenges associated with these strategies is provided along with appropriate post-data collection techniques that researchers should consider. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Response rates are an incomplete assessment of survey data quality, and quick reactions to response rate should be avoided. Based on a five-question decision making framework, we offer potential ways to assess nonresponse bias, along with a description of the advantages and disadvantages to each.
CONCLUSIONS: It is important that the quality of survey data be considered to assess the relative contribution to the literature of a given study. Authors and funding agencies should consider the potential effects of nonresponse bias both before and after survey administration and report the results of assessments of nonresponse bias in addition to response rates. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23046097      PMCID: PMC3681236          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  22 in total

1.  Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration.

Authors:  R M Groves; E Singer; A Corning
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

2.  Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires.

Authors:  S M Cummings; L A Savitz; T R Konrad
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Using telephone interviews to reduce nonresponse bias to mail surveys of health plan members.

Authors:  Floyd Jackson Fowler; Patricia M Gallagher; Vickie L Stringfellow; Alan M Zaslavsky; Joseph W Thompson; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Comparison of telephone with World Wide Web-based responses by parents and teens to a follow-up survey after injury.

Authors:  Frederick P Rivara; Thomas D Koepsell; Jin Wang; Dennis Durbin; Kenneth M Jaffe; Monica Vavilala; Andrea Dorsch; Maria Roper-Caldbeck; Eileen Houseknecht; Nancy Temkin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Randomized trial of 5 dollars versus 10 dollars monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; Peter A Ubel; Jesse A Berlin; David A Asch
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Mixed-mode administration reduced bias and enhanced poststratification adjustments in a health behavior survey.

Authors:  Alisha D Baines; Melissa R Partin; Michael Davern; Todd H Rockwood
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Enhancing response rates in physician surveys: the limited utility of electronic options.

Authors:  Keith Nicholls; Kathryn Chapman; Thomas Shaw; Allen Perkins; Margaret Murray Sullivan; Susan Crutchfield; Eddie Reed
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Lottery-based versus fixed incentives to increase clinicians' response to surveys.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; Rachel Kohn; Aaron Dornbrand-Lo; Thomas Metkus; David A Asch; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  The effect of cash and other financial inducements on the response rate of general practitioners in a national postal study.

Authors:  A Deehan; L Templeton; C Taylor; C Drummond; J Strang
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  A demonstration of the impact of response bias on the results of patient satisfaction surveys.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Brian E Clauser; Terry Field; Robert A Yood; Jerry H Gurwitz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  86 in total

1.  CKD Prevalence Varies across the European General Population.

Authors:  Katharina Brück; Vianda S Stel; Giovanni Gambaro; Stein Hallan; Henry Völzke; Johan Ärnlöv; Mika Kastarinen; Idris Guessous; José Vinhas; Bénédicte Stengel; Hermann Brenner; Jerzy Chudek; Solfrid Romundstad; Charles Tomson; Alfonso Otero Gonzalez; Aminu K Bello; Jean Ferrieres; Luigi Palmieri; Gemma Browne; Vincenzo Capuano; Wim Van Biesen; Carmine Zoccali; Ron Gansevoort; Gerjan Navis; Dietrich Rothenbacher; Pietro Manuel Ferraro; Dorothea Nitsch; Christoph Wanner; Kitty J Jager
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Trust and Reflection in Primary Care Practice Redesign.

Authors:  Holly Jordan Lanham; Raymond F Palmer; Luci K Leykum; Reuben R McDaniel; Paul A Nutting; Kurt C Stange; Benjamin F Crabtree; William L Miller; Carlos Roberto Jaén
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Postgraduate training in Ireland: expectations and experience.

Authors:  D Bennett; T Dornan; C Bergin; M Horgan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  What we don't know can hurt us: Nonresponse bias assessment in birth defects research.

Authors:  Paula D Strassle; Cynthia H Cassell; Stuart K Shapira; Sarah C Tinker; Robert E Meyer; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2015-07-14

5.  Physical Therapist Practice in the Intensive Care Unit: Results of a National Survey.

Authors:  Daniel Malone; Kyle Ridgeway; Amy Nordon-Craft; Parker Moss; Margaret Schenkman; Marc Moss
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2015-06-04

6.  Nonresponse rates are a problematic indicator of nonresponse bias in survey research.

Authors:  Michael Davern
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Prescription drug use during and immediately before pregnancy in Hawai'i—findings from the Hawai'i Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2009-2011.

Authors:  Emily K Roberson; Eric L Hurwitz
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2014-12

8.  Accelerating Improvement and Narrowing Gaps: Trends in Patients' Experiences with Hospital Care Reflected in HCAHPS Public Reporting.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Christopher W Cohea; William G Lehrman; Elizabeth H Goldstein; Paul D Cleary; Laura A Giordano; Megan K Beckett; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Association between childhood school segregation and changes in adult sense of control in the African American health cohort.

Authors:  Fredric D Wolinsky; Theodore K Malmstrom; J Phillip Miller; Elena M Andresen; Mario Schootman; Douglas K Miller
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  A scenario-based, randomized trial of patient values and functional prognosis on intensivist intent to discuss withdrawing life support.

Authors:  Alison E Turnbull; Jenna R Krall; A Parker Ruhl; J Randall Curtis; Scott D Halpern; Bryan M Lau; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.