Literature DB >> 23380309

Developing a theoretical framework to illustrate associations among patient satisfaction, body image and quality of life for women undergoing breast reconstruction.

Michelle Cororve Fingeret1, Summer W Nipomnick, Melissa A Crosby, Gregory P Reece.   

Abstract

Within the field of breast reconstruction there is increasing focus on patient-reported outcomes related to satisfaction, body image, and quality of life. These outcomes are deemed highly relevant because the primary goal of breast reconstruction is to recreate the appearance of a breast (or breasts) that is satisfying to the patient. Prominent researchers have suggested the need to develop improved standards for outcome evaluation which can ultimately benefit patients as well as physicians. The purpose of this article is to summarize key findings in the area of patient-reported outcomes for breast reconstruction and introduce a theoretical framework for advancing research in this field. We conducted an extensive literature review of outcome studies for breast reconstruction focusing on patient-reported results. We developed a theoretical framework illustrating core patient-reported outcomes related to breast reconstruction and factors associated with these outcomes. Our theoretical model highlights domains and distinguishing features of patient satisfaction, body image, and quality of life outcomes for women undergoing breast reconstruction. This model further identifies a broad range of variables (e.g., historical/premorbid influences, disease and treatment-related factors) that have been found to influence patient-reported outcomes and need to be taken into consideration when designing future research in this area. Additional attention is given to examining the relationship between patient reported outcomes and outside evaluation of breast reconstruction. Our proposed theoretical framework suggests key opportunities to expand research in this area with the goal of optimizing body image adjustment, satisfaction, and psychosocial outcomes for the individual patient.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23380309      PMCID: PMC3681916          DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev        ISSN: 0305-7372            Impact factor:   12.111


  96 in total

1.  The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: a 100-case study.

Authors:  Chunjun Liu; Jie Luan; Lanhua Mu; Kai Ji
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  A body image scale for use with cancer patients.

Authors:  P Hopwood; I Fletcher; A Lee; S Al Ghazal
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Qualitative assessment of breast reconstruction in a specialist breast unit.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Nano; Peter Grantley Gill; James Kollias; Melissa Anne Bochner; Nicholas Carter; Helen R Winefield
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  Knowledge, satisfaction with information, decisional conflict and psychological morbidity amongst women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Simone De Morgan; Sally Redman; Catherine D'Este; Kris Rogers
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-08-09

5.  Patient satisfaction: a valid concept?

Authors:  B Williams
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients.

Authors:  Peter G Cordeiro; Andrea L Pusic; Joseph J Disa; Beryl McCormick; Kimberly VanZee
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  The impact of breast cancer on sexuality, body image, and intimate relationships.

Authors:  L R Schover
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment.

Authors:  Veronique F Cocquyt; Phillip N Blondeel; Herman T Depypere; Karlien A Van De Sijpe; Kristof K Daems; Stanislas J Monstrey; Simon J P Van Belle
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2003-07

9.  Toward a theory of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  S U Linder-Pelz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  A research agenda for appearance changes due to breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Mugdha Dabeer; Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Fatima Merchant; Gregory P Reece; Elisabeth K Beahm; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2008-06-16
View more
  20 in total

1.  Psychometric development of a new body image scale for breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Erika Biederman; Andrea Cohee; Patrick Monahan; Timothy Stump; Victoria Champion
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2019-06-25

2.  Body image screening for cancer patients undergoing reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Summer Nipomnick; Michele Guindani; Donald Baumann; Matthew Hanasono; Melissa Crosby
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Body image and sexual function in women after treatment for anal and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Catherine Benedict; Errol J Philip; Raymond E Baser; Jeanne Carter; Tammy A Schuler; Lina Jandorf; Katherine DuHamel; Christian Nelson
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Our genes, our selves: hereditary breast cancer and biological citizenship in Norway.

Authors:  Kari Nyheim Solbrække; Håvard Søiland; Kirsten Lode; Birgitta Haga Gripsrud
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-03

5.  Patient-reported outcomes among women with unilateral breast cancer undergoing breast conservation versus single or double mastectomy.

Authors:  Catherine Pesce; Jennifer Jaffe; Kristine Kuchta; Katharine Yao; Mark Sisco
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Body Image in Younger Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carly L Paterson; Cecile A Lengacher; Kristine A Donovan; Kevin E Kip; Cindy S Tofthagen
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

7.  Body image and quality of life of breast cancer patients: influence of timing and stage of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Irene Teo; Gregory P Reece; Israel C Christie; Michele Guindani; Mia K Markey; Leslie J Heinberg; Melissa A Crosby; Michelle Cororve Fingeret
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 8.  Managing body image difficulties of adult cancer patients: lessons from available research.

Authors:  Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Irene Teo; Daniel E Epner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Body image dissatisfaction in patients undergoing breast reconstruction: Examining the roles of breast symmetry and appearance investment.

Authors:  Irene Teo; Gregory P Reece; Sheng-Cheng Huang; Kanika Mahajan; Johnny Andon; Pujjal Khanal; Clement Sun; Krista Nicklaus; Fatima Merchant; Mia K Markey; Michelle Cororve Fingeret
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  A qualitative assessment of body image in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer.

Authors:  Justin B Moore; Mollie R Canzona; Nicole Puccinelli-Ortega; Denisha Little-Greene; Katie E Duckworth; Michelle C Fingeret; Edward H Ip; Stacy D Sanford; John M Salsman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.