Vimal K Mishra1, Robert E Hoyt2, Susan E Wolver3, Ann Yoshihashi4, Colin Banas1. 1. Division of Hospital Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia, United States. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia, United States. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine, Physician Informaticist, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia, United States. 4. Pensacola, Florida, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Access to medical encounter notes (OpenNotes) is believed to empower patients and improve the quality and safety of care. The impact of such access is not well understood beyond select health care systems and notes from primary care providers. OBJECTIVES: This article analyzes patients' perceptions about the patient portal experience with access to primary care and specialist's notes and evaluates free-text comments as an improvement opportunity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients at an academic health care system who accessed the patient portal from February 2016 to May 2016 were provided a link to complete a 15-item online survey. Those who had viewed at least one note were asked about patient characteristics, frequency of note access, note usefulness, note understanding, and if any action was taken after accessing the note. Free-text comments were associated with nine questions which were analyzed using qualitative methods. RESULTS: A total of 23% (1,487/6,439) of patients who viewed the survey in the portal, participated. Seventy-six percent (1,126/1,487) knew that the notes were available on the portal, and of those, 957 had viewed at least one note to continue the survey. Ninety percent of those were older than 30 years of age, and 90% had some college education. The majority (83%) thought OpenNotes helped them take better care of themselves, without increasing worry (94%) or contacting the physician after reading the note (91%). The qualitative analysis of free-text responses demonstrated multiple positive and negative themes, and they were analyzed for potential improvement opportunities. CONCLUSION: Our survey confirms that patients who choose to access their primary care and specialists' online medical records perceive benefits of OpenNotes. Additionally, the qualitative analysis of comments revealed positive benefits and several potential patient portal improvement opportunities which could inform implementation of OpenNotes at other health systems. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
BACKGROUND: Access to medical encounter notes (OpenNotes) is believed to empower patients and improve the quality and safety of care. The impact of such access is not well understood beyond select health care systems and notes from primary care providers. OBJECTIVES: This article analyzes patients' perceptions about the patient portal experience with access to primary care and specialist's notes and evaluates free-text comments as an improvement opportunity. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients at an academic health care system who accessed the patient portal from February 2016 to May 2016 were provided a link to complete a 15-item online survey. Those who had viewed at least one note were asked about patient characteristics, frequency of note access, note usefulness, note understanding, and if any action was taken after accessing the note. Free-text comments were associated with nine questions which were analyzed using qualitative methods. RESULTS: A total of 23% (1,487/6,439) of patients who viewed the survey in the portal, participated. Seventy-six percent (1,126/1,487) knew that the notes were available on the portal, and of those, 957 had viewed at least one note to continue the survey. Ninety percent of those were older than 30 years of age, and 90% had some college education. The majority (83%) thought OpenNotes helped them take better care of themselves, without increasing worry (94%) or contacting the physician after reading the note (91%). The qualitative analysis of free-text responses demonstrated multiple positive and negative themes, and they were analyzed for potential improvement opportunities. CONCLUSION: Our survey confirms that patients who choose to access their primary care and specialists' online medical records perceive benefits of OpenNotes. Additionally, the qualitative analysis of comments revealed positive benefits and several potential patient portal improvement opportunities which could inform implementation of OpenNotes at other health systems. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Authors: John N Mafi; Roanne Mejilla; Henry Feldman; Long Ngo; Tom Delbanco; Jonathan Darer; Christina Wee; Jan Walker Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Tom Delbanco; Jan Walker; Sigall K Bell; Jonathan D Darer; Joann G Elmore; Nadine Farag; Henry J Feldman; Roanne Mejilla; Long Ngo; James D Ralston; Stephen E Ross; Neha Trivedi; Elisabeth Vodicka; Suzanne G Leveille Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Kim M Nazi; Carolyn L Turvey; Dawn M Klein; Timothy P Hogan; Susan S Woods Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Sigall K Bell; Roanne Mejilla; Melissa Anselmo; Jonathan D Darer; Joann G Elmore; Suzanne Leveille; Long Ngo; James D Ralston; Tom Delbanco; Jan Walker Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Jennifer L Wolff; Jonathan D Darer; Andrea Berger; Deserae Clarke; Jamie A Green; Rebecca A Stametz; Tom Delbanco; Jan Walker Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Sigall K Bell; Patricia H Folcarelli; Melissa K Anselmo; Bradley H Crotty; Lydia A Flier; Jan Walker Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2015-08
Authors: Eric Wright; Jonathan Darer; Xiaoqin Tang; Jason Thompson; Lorraine Tusing; Alan Fossa; Tom Delbanco; Long Ngo; Jan Walker Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: S Trent Rosenbloom; Jeffery R L Smith; Rita Bowen; Janelle Burns; Lauren Riplinger; Thomas H Payne Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Catherine Arnott Smith; Ryan J Coller; Shannon M Dean; Daniel Sklansky; Peter L T Hoonakker; Windy Smith; Anne S Thurber; Brad D Ehlenfeldt; Michelle M Kelly Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2020-03-04
Authors: Mohammad Alarifi; Timothy Patrick; Abdulrahman Jabour; Min Wu; Jake Luo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jan Walker; Suzanne Leveille; Sigall Bell; Hannah Chimowitz; Zhiyong Dong; Joann G Elmore; Leonor Fernandez; Alan Fossa; Macda Gerard; Patricia Fitzgerald; Kendall Harcourt; Sara Jackson; Thomas H Payne; Jocelyn Perez; Hannah Shucard; Rebecca Stametz; Catherine DesRoches; Tom Delbanco Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 5.428