Literature DB >> 26373936

Correlations Between Pitch and Phoneme Perception in Cochlear Implant Users and Their Normal Hearing Peers.

Raymond L Goldsworthy1.   

Abstract

This study examined correlations between pitch and phoneme perception for nine cochlear implant users and nine normal hearing listeners. Pure tone frequency discrimination thresholds were measured for frequencies of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz. Complex tone fundamental frequency (F0) discrimination thresholds were measured for F0s of 110, 220, and 440 Hz. The effects of amplitude and frequency roving were measured under the rationale that individuals who are robust to such perturbations would perform better on phoneme perception measures. Phoneme identification was measured using consonant and vowel materials in quiet, in stationary speech-shaped noise (SSN), in spectrally notched SSN, and in temporally gated SSN. Cochlear implant pure tone frequency discrimination thresholds ranged between 1.5 and 9.9 %, while cochlear implant complex tone F0 discrimination thresholds ranged between 2.6 and 28.5 %. On average, cochlear implant users had 5.3 dB of masking release for consonants and 8.4 dB of masking release for vowels when measured in temporally gated SSN compared to stationary SSN. Correlations with phoneme identification measures were generally higher for complex tone discrimination measures than for pure tone discrimination measures. Correlations with phoneme identification measures were also generally higher for pitch perception measures that included amplitude and frequency roving. The strongest correlations were observed for measures of complex tone F0 discrimination with phoneme identification in temporally gated SSN. The results of this study suggest that musical training or signal processing strategies that improve F0 discrimination should improve consonant identification in fluctuating noise.

Keywords:  cochlear implants; pitch perception; psychophysics; speech reception

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26373936      PMCID: PMC4636591          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-015-0541-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  46 in total

1.  Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants.

Authors:  J J Hanekom; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music.

Authors:  S Fujita; J Ito
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Consonant recordings for speech testing.

Authors:  R V Shannon; A Jensvold; M Padilla; M E Robert; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Learning to perceive pitch differences.

Authors:  Laurent Demany; Catherine Semal
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.

Authors:  Andrew Vandali; David Sly; Robert Cowan; Richard van Hoesel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Derivation of primary parameters and procedures for use in speech intelligibility predictions.

Authors:  C V Pavlovic
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Psychophysical studies for two multiple-channel cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Y C Tong; G M Clark; P J Blamey; P A Busby; R C Dowell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.

Authors:  Su-Hyun Jin; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2012-11-19

10.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  12 in total

1.  Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Factors Affecting Speech Reception in Background Noise with a Vocoder Implementation of the FAST Algorithm.

Authors:  Shaikat Hossain; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

3.  Frequency change detection and speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Gabrielle Underwood; Kelli McGuire; Chun Liang; David R Moore; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Audibility emphasis of low-level sounds improves consonant identification while preserving vowel identification for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Susan R S Bissmeyer; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.723

5.  Computational Modeling of Synchrony in the Auditory Nerve in Response to Acoustic and Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.387

6.  Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Susan R S Bissmeyer; Andres Camarena
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-03

7.  Pitch perception is more robust to interference and better resolved when provided by pulse rate than by modulation frequency of cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Andres Camarena; Susan R S Bissmeyer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.672

8.  Residual Hearing Preservation with the Evo® Cochlear Implant Electrode Array: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Fabiana Danieli; Ana Tereza de Matos Magalhães; Dan Gnansia; Michel Hoen
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-16

9.  The Effect of Side of Implantation on the Cortical Processing of Frequency Changes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Chun Liang; Lisa H Wenstrup; Ravi N Samy; Jing Xiang; Fawen Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Correlation between Auditory Spectral Resolution and Speech Perception in Children with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Zahra Jeddi; Younes Lotfi; Abdollah Moossavi; Enayatollah Bakhshi; Seyed Basir Hashemi
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2019-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.