Literature DB >> 7808889

Preference for darker faces in photographs at different phases of the menstrual cycle: preliminary assessment of evidence for a hormonal relationship.

P Frost1.   

Abstract

Six pairs of photographs showing human faces of both sexes were presented to 98 women who had to choose the more pleasing one of each pair. Faces within each pair were identical except for a slight difference in complexion. For women not taking oral contraceptives, skin-color preference differed significantly between two groups of subjects classified according to the current phase of their self-reported menstrual cycle: darker male faces were judged more positively by subjects in the phase when the estrogen/progesterone ratio was expected to be high than by those in the phase when this ratio was expected to be low. Female faces evoked no such cyclic response. Users of oral contraceptives showed no cyclic response to either male or female faces. These results suggest a mental mechanism whose inputs are (a) hormonal state, (b) visual identification of the sex of the face being observed, and (c) visual recognition of complexion, and whose output enters into evaluation of male and female faces. Replication with direct measures of hormonal state is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7808889     DOI: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  10 in total

1.  Cyclic variation in women's preferences for masculine traits : Potential hormonal causes.

Authors:  David Andrew Puts
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2006-03

2.  Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape.

Authors:  A C Little; B C Jones; I S Penton-Voak; D M Burt; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Human oestrus.

Authors:  Steven W Gangestad; Randy Thornhill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Evidence for genetic variation in human mate preferences for sexually dimorphic physical traits.

Authors:  Karin J H Verweij; Andrea V Burri; Brendan P Zietsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Emotional expressions beyond facial muscle actions. A call for studying autonomic signals and their impact on social perception.

Authors:  Mariska E Kret
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-27

6.  Natural variation in female reproductive hormones does not affect contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Abigail L M Webb; Paul B Hibbard; Rick O'Gorman
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Facial Skin Coloration Affects Perceived Health of Human Faces.

Authors:  Ian D Stephen; Miriam J Law Smith; Michael R Stirrat; David I Perrett
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Preferences across the menstrual cycle for masculinity and symmetry in photographs of male faces and bodies.

Authors:  Marianne Peters; Leigh W Simmons; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Do men's faces really signal heritable immunocompetence?

Authors:  Isabel M L Scott; Andrew P Clark; Lynda G Boothroyd; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  Associations of observer's gender, Body Mass Index and internalization of societal beauty ideals to visual body processing.

Authors:  Valentina Cazzato; Elizabeth R Walters; Cosimo Urgesi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-01-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.