Literature DB >> 27752965

The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners' Facial Photographs : A Conjoint Analysis Study.

Justin K Mogilski1, Lisa L M Welling2.   

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism, symmetry, and coloration in human faces putatively signal information relevant to mate selection and reproduction. Although the independent contributions of these characteristics to judgments of attractiveness are well established, relatively few studies have examined whether individuals prioritize certain features over others. Here, participants (N = 542, 315 female) ranked six sets of facial photographs (3 male, 3 female) by their preference for starting long- and short-term romantic relationships with each person depicted. Composite-based digital transformations were applied such that each image set contained 11 different versions of the same identity. Each photograph in each image set had a unique combination of three traits: sexual dimorphism, symmetry, and color cues to health. Using conjoint analysis to evaluate participants' ranking decisions, we found that participants prioritized cues to sexual dimorphism over symmetry and color cues to health. Sexual dimorphism was also found to be relatively more important for the evaluation of male faces than for female faces, whereas symmetry and color cues to health were relatively more important for the evaluation of female faces than for male faces. Symmetry and color cues to health were more important for long-term versus short-term evaluations for female faces, but not male faces. Analyses of utility estimates reveal that our data are consistent with research showing that preferences for facial masculinity and femininity in male and female faces vary according to relationship context. These findings are interpreted in the context of previous work examining the influence of these facial attributes on romantic partner perception.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conjoint analysis; Faces; Health; Sexual dimorphism; Symmetry; Trade-offs

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27752965     DOI: 10.1007/s12110-016-9277-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  64 in total

1.  Facial attractiveness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Clinical algorithm for malaria during low and high transmission seasons.

Authors:  L Muhe; B Oljira; H Degefu; F Enquesellassie; M W Weber
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  The perception of face gender: the role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification.

Authors:  A J O'Toole; K A Deffenbacher; D Valentin; K McKee; D Huff; H Abdi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

4.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Sex-typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive?

Authors:  G Rhodes; C Hickford; L Jeffery
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2000-02

6.  Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high.

Authors:  B C Jones; A C Little; L Boothroyd; L M Debruine; D R Feinberg; M J Law Smith; R E Cornwell; F R Moore; D I Perrett
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.587

7.  Evaluation of clinical pallor in the identification and treatment of children with moderate and severe anaemia.

Authors:  L Muhe; B Oljira; H Degefu; S Jaffar; M W Weber
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women.

Authors:  Bernhard Fink; Nick Neave; Hanna Seydel
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.937

9.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating.

Authors:  D M Buss; D P Schmitt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Men report stronger attraction to femininity in women's faces when their testosterone levels are high.

Authors:  Lisa L M Welling; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine; Finlay G Smith; David R Feinberg; Anthony C Little; Emad A S Al-Dujaili
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 3.587

View more
  6 in total

1.  Fluctuating Asymmetry and Sexual Dimorphism in Human Facial Morphology: A Multi-Variate Study.

Authors:  Omid Ekrami; Peter Claes; Ellen Van Assche; Mark D Shriver; Seth M Weinberg; Mary L Marazita; Susan Walsh; Stefan Van Dongen
Journal:  Symmetry (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.713

2.  Effect of aging and body characteristics on facial sexual dimorphism in the Caucasian Population.

Authors:  Zala Skomina; Miha Verdenik; Nataša Ihan Hren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  E-perceptions and Business 'Mating': The Communication Effects of the Relative Width of Males' Faces in Business Portraits.

Authors:  Eveline van Zeeland; Jörg Henseler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-16

4.  The Effects of Pitch Manipulation on Male Ratings of Female Speakers and Their Voices.

Authors:  Christina Krumpholz; Cliodhna Quigley; Karsan Ameen; Christoph Reuter; Leonida Fusani; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-07

5.  Emotional Accessibility Is More Important Than Sexual Accessibility in Evaluating Romantic Relationships - Especially for Women: A Conjoint Analysis.

Authors:  T J Wade; Justin Mogilski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-14

6.  Perceived attractiveness of Czech faces across 10 cultures: Associations with sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry, and eye color.

Authors:  Tomáš Kočnar; S Adil Saribay; Karel Kleisner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.