Literature DB >> 10825783

Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review.

J H Langlois1, L Kalakanis, A J Rubenstein, A Larson, M Hallam, M Smoot.   

Abstract

Common maxims about beauty suggest that attractiveness is not important in life. In contrast, both fitness-related evolutionary theory and socialization theory suggest that attractiveness influences development and interaction. In 11 meta-analyses, the authors evaluate these contradictory claims, demonstrating that (a) raters agree about who is and is not attractive, both within and across cultures; (b) attractive children and adults are judged more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; (c) attractive children and adults are treated more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; and (d) attractive children and adults exhibit more positive behaviors and traits than unattractive children and adults. Results are used to evaluate social and fitness-related evolutionary theories and the veracity of maxims about beauty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10825783     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  234 in total

Review 1.  Growing up with idiopathic short stature: psychosocial development and hormone treatment; a critical review.

Authors:  H Visser-van Balen; G Sinnema; R Geenen
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Why are average faces attractive? The effect of view and averageness on the attractiveness of female faces.

Authors:  Tim Valentine; Stephen Darling; Mary Donnelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

3.  Remembering first impressions: effects of intentionality and diagnosticity on subsequent memory.

Authors:  Roee Gilron; Angela H Gutchess
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Your Face is Your Fortune: Does Adolescent Attractiveness Predict Intimate Relationships Later in Life?

Authors:  Amelia Karraker; Kamil Sicinski; Donald Moynihan
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS AND LIFETIME EARNINGS: EVIDENCE FROM A COHORT STUDY.

Authors:  John Karl Scholz; Kamil Sicinski
Journal:  Rev Econ Stat       Date:  2015-03-02

6.  Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: a neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Logan T Trujillo; Jessica M Jankowitsch; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Subtyping Ageism: Policy Issues in Succession and Consumption.

Authors:  Michael S North; Susan T Fiske
Journal:  Soc Issues Policy Rev       Date:  2013-01-01

8.  Estimating the sex-specific effects of genes on facial attractiveness and sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Dorian G Mitchem; Alicia M Purkey; Nicholas M Grebe; Gregory Carey; Christine E Garver-Apgar; Timothy C Bates; Rosalind Arden; John K Hewitt; Sarah E Medland; Nicholas G Martin; Brendan P Zietsch; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Can beauty be ignored? Effects of facial attractiveness on covert attention.

Authors:  Jie Sui; Chang Hong Liu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

10.  SHIFTING THE PROTOTYPE: EXPERIENCE WITH FACES INFLUENCES AFFECTIVE AND ATTRACTIVENESS PREFERENCES.

Authors:  Connor P Principe; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Soc Cogn       Date:  2012-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.