Literature DB >> 7924253

Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness.

K Grammer1, R Thornhill.   

Abstract

We hypothesized from the parasite theory of sexual selection that men (Homo sapiens) would prefer averageness and symmetry in women's faces, that women would prefer averageness and symmetry in men's faces, and that women would prefer largeness (not averageness) of the secondary sexual traits of men's faces. We generated computer images of men's and women's faces and of composites of the faces of each sex, and then had men and women rate opposite-sex faces for 4 variables (attractive, dominant, sexy, and healthy). Symmetry, averageness, and the sizes of facial features were measured on the computerized faces. The hypotheses were supported, with the exception of the hypothesized effects of averageness of female and male faces on attractiveness ratings. This is the first study to show that facial symmetry has a positive influence on facial attractiveness ratings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7924253     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  120 in total

1.  It's not just average faces that are attractive: computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive.

Authors:  Jamin Halberstadt; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

2.  Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The relationship between sexual dimorphism in human faces and fluctuating asymmetry.

Authors:  Nicole Koehler; Leigh W Simmons; Gillian Rhodes; Marianne Peters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Reproductive strategy, sexual development and attraction to facial characteristics.

Authors:  R Elisabeth Cornwell; Miriam J Law Smith; Lynda G Boothroyd; Fhionna R Moore; Hasker P Davis; Michael Stirrat; Bernard Tiddeman; David I Perrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Effects of asynchrony on symmetry perception.

Authors:  Gert van der Vloed; Arpád Csathó; Peter A van der Helm
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-09

6.  The role of facial attractiveness and facial masculinity/femininity in sex classification of faces.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hoss; Jennifer L Ramsey; Angela M Griffin; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Symmetrical crypsis and asymmetrical signalling in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis.

Authors:  Keri V Langridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Three-quarter views are subjectively good because object orientation is uncertain.

Authors:  Ryosuke Niimi; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

9.  Estimating the sex-specific effects of genes on facial attractiveness and sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Dorian G Mitchem; Alicia M Purkey; Nicholas M Grebe; Gregory Carey; Christine E Garver-Apgar; Timothy C Bates; Rosalind Arden; John K Hewitt; Sarah E Medland; Nicholas G Martin; Brendan P Zietsch; Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.

Authors:  A C Little; D M Burt; I S Penton-Voak; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.