Literature DB >> 12018337

Talker discrimination by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: preliminary results.

Miranda Cleary1, David B Pisoni.   

Abstract

Forty-four school-age children who had used a multichannel cochlear implant (CI) for at least 4 years were tested to assess their ability to discriminate differences between recorded pairs of female voices uttering sentences. Children were asked to respond "same voice" or "different voice" on each trial. Two conditions were examined. In one condition, the linguistic content of the sentence was always held constant and only the talker's voice varied from trial to trial. In another condition, the linguistic content of the utterance also varied so that to correctly respond "same voice," the child needed to recognize that two different sentences were spoken by the same talker. Data from normal-hearing children were used to establish that these tasks were well within the capabilities of children without hearing impairment. For the children with CIs, in the "fixed sentence condition" the mean proportion correct was 68%, which, although significantly different from the 50% score expected by chance, suggests that the children with CIs found this discrimination task rather difficult. In the "varied sentence condition," however, the mean proportion correct was only 57%, indicating that the children were essentially unable to recognize an unfamiliar talker's voice when the linguistic content of the paired sentences differed. Correlations with other speech and language outcome measures are also reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12018337      PMCID: PMC3432923          DOI: 10.1177/00034894021110s523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl        ISSN: 0096-8056


  10 in total

1.  Judgment of personal characteristics and emotions from nonverbal properties of speech.

Authors:  E KRAMER
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Articulation testing methods.

Authors:  J P EGAN
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1948-09       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Independent evaluation of the speech perception abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system.

Authors:  M J Osberger; R T Miyamoto; S Zimmerman-Phillips; J L Kemink; B S Stroer; J B Firszt; M A Novak
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Gina M Torretta; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 2.017

5.  Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K I Kirk; D B Pisoni; M J Osberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.

Authors:  M S Sommers; K I Kirk; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Development of voice recognition: parallels with face recognition.

Authors:  V A Mann; R Diamond; S Carey
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1979-02

8.  A picture identification test for hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  M Ross; J Lerman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1970-03

9.  Age recognition from voice.

Authors:  P H Ptacek; E K Sander
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1966-06

10.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

Authors:  J Bench; A Kowal; J Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-08
  10 in total
  19 in total

1.  Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Sherol Chinchilla; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-20

3.  Multiple routes to the perceptual learning of speech.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; Tessa Bent; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).

Authors:  Adrienne S Roman; David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger; Kathleen F Faulkner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski; Johanna G Nicholas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The impact of musical training and tone language experience on talker identification.

Authors:  Xin Xie; Emily Myers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Talker Variability and Bimodal Hearing.

Authors:  Yi-Ping Chang; Ronald Y Chang; Chun-Yi Lin; Xin Luo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Influence of early linguistic experience on regional dialect categorization by an adult cochlear implant user: a case study.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.