Literature DB >> 8654902

Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users.

K I Kirk1, D B Pisoni, M J Osberger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were 1) to examine the effect of lexical characteristics on the spoken word recognition performance of children who use a multichannel cochlear implant (CI), and 2) to compare their performance on lexically controlled word lists with their performance on a traditional test of word recognition, the PB-K.
DESIGN: In two different experiments, 14 to 19 pediatric CI users who demonstrated at least some open-set speech recognition served as subjects. Based on computational analyses, word lists were constructed to allow systematic examination of the effects of word frequency, lexical density (i.e., the number of phonemically similar words, or neighbors), and word length. The subjects' performance on these new tests and the PB-K also was compared.
RESULTS: The percentage of words correctly identified was significantly higher for lexically "easy" words (high frequency words with few neighbors) than for "hard" words (low frequency words with many neighbors), but there was no lexical effect on phoneme recognition scores. Word recognition performance was consistently higher on the lexically controlled lists than on the PB-K. In addition, word recognition was better for multisyllabic than for momosyllabic stimuli.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that pediatric cochlear implant users are sensitive to the acoustic-phonetic similarities among words, that they organize words into similarity neighborhoods in long-term memory, and they use this structural information in recognizing isolated words. The results further suggest that the PB-K underestimates these subjects' spoken words recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8654902      PMCID: PMC3495322          DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199510000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  26 in total

1.  Performance over time of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children using a multichannel cochlear implant.

Authors:  H Fryauf-Bertschy; R S Tyler; D M Kelsay; B J Gantz
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-08

2.  ON PHONEMIC ANALYSIS OF SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS.

Authors:  J V TOBIAS
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1964-03

3.  Longitudinal evaluation of communication skills of children with single- or multichannel cochlear implants.

Authors:  R T Miyamoto; M J Osberger; A M Robbins; W A Myres; K Kessler; M L Pope
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1992-05

4.  Effect of age at onset of deafness on children's speech perception abilities with a cochlear implant.

Authors:  M J Osberger; S L Todd; S W Berry; A M Robbins; R T Miyamoto
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  The development of recorded auditory tests for measuring hearing loss for speech.

Authors:  C V HUDGINS; J E HAWKINS
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1947-01       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Similarity neighbourhoods of words in young children's lexicons.

Authors:  J Charles-Luce; P A Luce
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  1990-02

7.  Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Paul A Luce; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

9.  Early speech development in deaf infants.

Authors:  R Lach; D Ling; A H Ling; N Ship
Journal:  Am Ann Deaf       Date:  1970-09

10.  Prelingually deafened children's performance with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.

Authors:  R T Miyamoto; M J Osberger; A M Robbins; W A Myres; K Kessler
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1993-09
View more
  105 in total

1.  Modeling spoken word recognition performance by pediatric cochlear implant users using feature identification.

Authors:  S A Frisch; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Some computational analyses of the PBK test: effects of frequency and lexical density on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  T A Meyer; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  PET imaging of cochlear-implant and normal-hearing subjects listening to speech and nonspeech.

Authors:  D Wong; R T Miyamoto; D B Pisoni; M Sehgal; G D Hutchins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Cognitive factors and cochlear implants: some thoughts on perception, learning, and memory in speech perception.

Authors:  D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Using behavioral data to model open-set word recognition and lexical organization by pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  S Frisch; T A Meyer; D B Pisoni; M A Svirsky; K I Kirk
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

6.  Structure of mental lexicons of children who use cochlear implants: preliminary findings.

Authors:  S B Chin; T A Meyer; M Hay-McCutcheon; G A Wright; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

7.  Use of audiovisual information in speech perception by prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: a first report.

Authors:  L Lachs; D B Pisoni; K I Kirk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Imitation of nonwords by deaf children after cochlear implantation: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Miranda Cleary; Caitlin Dillon; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2002-05

9.  Imitation of nonwords by hearing impaired children with cochlear implants: suprasegmental analyses.

Authors:  Allyson K Carter; Caitlin M Dillon; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.346

10.  Assessing spoken word recognition in children who are deaf or hard of hearing: a translational approach.

Authors:  Karen Iler Kirk; Lindsay Prusick; Brian French; Chad Gotch; Laurie S Eisenberg; Nancy Young
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.