Literature DB >> 19773659

Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.

Jeremy L Loebach1, David B Pisoni, Mario A Svirsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess whether training on speech processed with an eight-channel noise vocoder to simulate the output of a cochlear implant would produce transfer of auditory perceptual learning to the recognition of nonspeech environmental sounds, the identification of speaker gender, and the discrimination of talkers by voice.
DESIGN: Twenty-four normal-hearing subjects were trained to transcribe meaningful English sentences processed with a noise vocoder simulation of a cochlear implant. An additional 24 subjects served as an untrained control group and transcribed the same sentences in their unprocessed form. All subjects completed pre- and post-test sessions in which they transcribed vocoded sentences to provide an assessment of training efficacy. Transfer of perceptual learning was assessed using a series of closed set, nonlinguistic tasks: subjects identified talker gender, discriminated the identity of pairs of talkers, and identified ecologically significant environmental sounds from a closed set of alternatives.
RESULTS: Although both groups of subjects showed significant pre- to post-test improvements, subjects who transcribed vocoded sentences during training performed significantly better at post-test than those in the control group. Both groups performed equally well on gender identification and talker discrimination. Subjects who received explicit training on the vocoded sentences, however, performed significantly better on environmental sound identification than the untrained subjects. Moreover, across both groups, pre-test speech performance and, to a higher degree, post-test speech performance, were significantly correlated with environmental sound identification. For both groups, environmental sounds that were characterized as having more salient temporal information were identified more often than environmental sounds that were characterized as having more salient spectral information.
CONCLUSIONS: Listeners trained to identify noise-vocoded sentences showed evidence of transfer of perceptual learning to the identification of environmental sounds. In addition, the correlation between environmental sound identification and sentence transcription indicates that subjects who were better able to use the degraded acoustic information to identify the environmental sounds were also better able to transcribe the linguistic content of novel sentences. Both trained and untrained groups performed equally well ( approximately 75% correct) on the gender-identification task, indicating that training did not have an effect on the ability to identify the gender of talkers. Although better than chance, performance on the talker discrimination task was poor overall ( approximately 55%), suggesting that either explicit training is required to discriminate talkers' voices reliably or that additional information (perhaps spectral in nature) not present in the vocoded speech is required to excel in such tasks. Taken together, the results suggest that although transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally degraded speech does occur, explicit task-specific training may be necessary for tasks that cannot rely on temporal information alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19773659      PMCID: PMC2794833          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b9c92d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  43 in total

1.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Rosen; A Faulkner; L Wilkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The effects of short-term training for spectrally mismatched noise-band speech.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Consolidation during sleep of perceptual learning of spoken language.

Authors:  Kimberly M Fenn; Howard C Nusbaum; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Comprehension of natural and synthetic speech: effects of predictability on the verification of sentences controlled for intelligibility.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; Laura M Manous; Michael J Dedina
Journal:  Comput Speech Lang       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 1.899

8.  Identification of speaker sex from isolated, voiceless fricatives.

Authors:  M F Schwartz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Influence of voice similarity on talker discrimination in children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Miranda Cleary; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Training and transfer-of-learning effects in disabled and normal readers: evidence of specific deficits.

Authors:  N J Benson; M W Lovett; C L Kroeber
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1997-03
View more
  12 in total

1.  The intelligibility of noise-vocoded speech: spectral information available from across-channel comparison of amplitude envelopes.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Robert J Summers; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study of the Impact of Online Music Training on Pitch and Timbre Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Nicole T Jiam; Mickael L Deroche; Patpong Jiradejvong; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-27

3.  Supra-Segmental Changes in Speech Production as a Result of Spectral Feedback Degradation: Comparison with Lombard Speech.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly; Yeling Wang; Nicholas Celestin; Lily Talesnick; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Auditory Learning Using a Portable Real-Time Vocoder: Preliminary Findings.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2012-11-19

6.  A preliminary report of music-based training for adult cochlear implant users: Rationales and development.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Emily Guthe; Virginia Driscoll; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2015-09

7.  Minimal effects of visual memory training on auditory performance of adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Sandra I Oba; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

8.  The Influence of the Type of Background Noise on Perceptual Learning of Speech in Noise.

Authors:  Liping Zhang; Friederike Schlaghecken; James Harte; Katherine L Roberts
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Lexico-semantic and acoustic-phonetic processes in the perception of noise-vocoded speech: implications for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Carolyn McGettigan; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25

10.  Perceptual learning of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Michel Ruben Benard; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.