Literature DB >> 25618071

The impact of musical training and tone language experience on talker identification.

Xin Xie1, Emily Myers2.   

Abstract

Listeners can use pitch changes in speech to identify talkers. Individuals exhibit large variability in sensitivity to pitch and in accuracy perceiving talker identity. In particular, people who have musical training or long-term tone language use are found to have enhanced pitch perception. In the present study, the influence of pitch experience on talker identification was investigated as listeners identified talkers in native language as well as non-native languages. Experiment 1 was designed to explore the influence of pitch experience on talker identification in two groups of individuals with potential advantages for pitch processing: musicians and tone language speakers. Experiment 2 further investigated individual differences in pitch processing and the contribution to talker identification by testing a mediation model. Cumulatively, the results suggested that (a) musical training confers an advantage for talker identification, supporting a shared resources hypothesis regarding music and language and (b) linguistic use of lexical tones also increases accuracy in hearing talker identity. Importantly, these two types of hearing experience enhance talker identification by sharpening pitch perception skills in a domain-general manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25618071      PMCID: PMC4304960          DOI: 10.1121/1.4904699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  36 in total

1.  Reading skills are related to global, but not local, acoustic pattern perception.

Authors:  Jessica M Foxton; Joel B Talcott; Caroline Witton; Hal Brace; Fiona McIntyre; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Influence of musical expertise on segmental and tonal processing in Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Céline Marie; Franco Delogu; Giulia Lampis; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Mireille Besson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study.

Authors:  Mari Tervaniemi; Viola Just; Stefan Koelsch; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Superior voice timbre processing in musicians.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Chartrand; Pascal Belin
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Individual differences in second-language proficiency: does musical ability matter?

Authors:  L Robert Slevc; Akira Miyake
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-08

6.  Perceptual scaling of voice identity: common dimensions for different vowels and speakers.

Authors:  Oliver Baumann; Pascal Belin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-26

7.  Music training improves verbal memory.

Authors:  A S Chan; Y C Ho; M C Cheung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-11-12       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Human voice recognition depends on language ability.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Stephanie N Del Tufo; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Why would Musical Training Benefit the Neural Encoding of Speech? The OPERA Hypothesis.

Authors:  Aniruddh D Patel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-29

10.  Evidence for shared cognitive processing of pitch in music and language.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Evelina G Fedorenko; Louis Vinke; Edward Gibson; Laura C Dilley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Voice-sensitive brain networks encode talker-specific phonetic detail.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.

Authors:  Juan Zhang; Xing Wang; Ning-Yu Wang; Xin Fu; Tian Gan; John J Galvin; Shelby Willis; Kevin Xu; Mathew Thomas; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Acoustic and linguistic factors affecting perceptual dissimilarity judgments of voices.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Kristina T Furbeck; Emily J Thurston
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.

Authors:  Deirdre E McLaughlin; Yaminah D Carter; Cecilia C Cheng; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The Jena Voice Learning and Memory Test (JVLMT): A standardized tool for assessing the ability to learn and recognize voices.

Authors:  Denise Humble; Stefan R Schweinberger; Axel Mayer; Tim L Jesgarzewsky; Christian Dobel; Romi Zäske
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-06-01

6.  Another bilingual advantage? Perception of talker-voice information.

Authors:  Susannahv Levi
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2017-06-09

7.  Reading fluency and pitch discrimination abilities in children with learning disabilities.

Authors:  Haidan Lu; Kaili Zhang; Qiaoyun Liu
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.285

8.  Effects of Noise on the Behavioral and Neural Categorization of Speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Lauren C Bush; Alex M Boudreaux
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.