Literature DB >> 28045787

Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).

Adrienne S Roman1, David B Pisoni, William G Kronenberger, Kathleen F Faulkner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Noise-vocoded speech is a valuable research tool for testing experimental hypotheses about the effects of spectral degradation on speech recognition in adults with normal hearing (NH). However, very little research has utilized noise-vocoded speech with children with NH. Earlier studies with children with NH focused primarily on the amount of spectral information needed for speech recognition without assessing the contribution of neurocognitive processes to speech perception and spoken word recognition. In this study, we first replicated the seminal findings reported by ) who investigated effects of lexical density and word frequency on noise-vocoded speech perception in a small group of children with NH. We then extended the research to investigate relations between noise-vocoded speech recognition abilities and five neurocognitive measures: auditory attention (AA) and response set, talker discrimination, and verbal and nonverbal short-term working memory.
DESIGN: Thirty-one children with NH between 5 and 13 years of age were assessed on their ability to perceive lexically controlled words in isolation and in sentences that were noise-vocoded to four spectral channels. Children were also administered vocabulary assessments (Peabody Picture Vocabulary test-4th Edition and Expressive Vocabulary test-2nd Edition) and measures of AA (NEPSY AA and response set and a talker discrimination task) and short-term memory (visual digit and symbol spans).
RESULTS: Consistent with the findings reported in the original ) study, we found that children perceived noise-vocoded lexically easy words better than lexically hard words. Words in sentences were also recognized better than the same words presented in isolation. No significant correlations were observed between noise-vocoded speech recognition scores and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary test-4th Edition using language quotients to control for age effects. However, children who scored higher on the Expressive Vocabulary test-2nd Edition recognized lexically easy words better than lexically hard words in sentences. Older children perceived noise-vocoded speech better than younger children. Finally, we found that measures of AA and short-term memory capacity were significantly correlated with a child's ability to perceive noise-vocoded isolated words and sentences.
CONCLUSIONS: First, we successfully replicated the major findings from the ) study. Because familiarity, phonological distinctiveness and lexical competition affect word recognition, these findings provide additional support for the proposal that several foundational elementary neurocognitive processes underlie the perception of spectrally degraded speech. Second, we found strong and significant correlations between performance on neurocognitive measures and children's ability to recognize words and sentences noise-vocoded to four spectral channels. These findings extend earlier research suggesting that perception of spectrally degraded speech reflects early peripheral auditory processes, as well as additional contributions of executive function, specifically, selective attention and short-term memory processes in spoken word recognition. The present findings suggest that AA and short-term memory support robust spoken word recognition in children with NH even under compromised and challenging listening conditions. These results are relevant to research carried out with listeners who have hearing loss, because they are routinely required to encode, process, and understand spectrally degraded acoustic signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28045787      PMCID: PMC5404985          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  57 in total

1.  Recognition of lexically controlled words and sentences by children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laurie S Eisenberg; Amy Schaefer Martinez; Suzanne R Holowecky; Stephanie Pogorelsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Speech timing and working memory in profoundly deaf children after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Rose A Burkholder; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2003-05

3.  Implicit sequence learning in deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Christopher M Conway; David B Pisoni; Esperanza M Anaya; Jennifer Karpicke; Shirley C Henning
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-01

4.  Informational masking of speech in children: effects of ipsilateral and contralateral distracters.

Authors:  Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  On the division of short-term and working memory: an examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Executive functioning and speech-language skills following long-term use of cochlear implants.

Authors:  William G Kronenberger; Bethany G Colson; Shirley C Henning; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2014-06-05

7.  Influence of voice similarity on talker discrimination in children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Miranda Cleary; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 9.  Neurocognitive factors in sensory restoration of early deafness: a connectome model.

Authors:  Andrej Kral; William G Kronenberger; David B Pisoni; Gerard M O'Donoghue
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 44.182

10.  Long-term speech and language outcomes in prelingually deaf children, adolescents and young adults who received cochlear implants in childhood.

Authors:  Chad V Ruffin; William G Kronenberger; Bethany G Colson; Shirley C Henning; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  6 in total

1.  Words-in-Noise Test Performance in Young Adults Perinatally HIV Infected and Exposed, Uninfected.

Authors:  Peter Torre; Jonathan S Russell; Renee Smith; Howard J Hoffman; Sonia Lee; Paige L Williams; Tzy-Jyun Yao
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Interactions Between Item Set and Vocoding in Serial Recall.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Mary C Luckasen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  The Effect of Remote Masking on the Reception of Speech by Young School-Age Children.

Authors:  Carla L Youngdahl; Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Frédéric Apoux; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Age-Related Performance on Vowel Identification and the Spectral-temporally Modulated Ripple Test in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Restricted Speech Recognition in Noise and Quality of Life of Hearing-Impaired Children and Adolescents With Cochlear Implants - Need for Studies Addressing This Topic With Valid Pediatric Quality of Life Instruments.

Authors:  Maria Huber; Clara Havas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-12

6.  Recognition of vocoded words and sentences in quiet and multi-talker babble with children and adults.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Garrison T Draves; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.